• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/9

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

9 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Overview
Adviser to the government in matters of law and legal opinion

Appointed by President on nomination of Taoiseach - not in government

Macauley 1966 no longer need fiat of AG to sue a Minister
Prosecution Role

All (other than summary jurisdiction) at suit of DPP (for AG)

Genocide, Geneva Conventions, Official Secrets- AG

Appeals from Court Criminal App and reference to Supreme Court on point of law – DPP & AG
Extradition - Quasi Judicial
Endorse warrants for extradition to Britain-clear intention to prosecute on sufficient evidence

Wheeler v Culligan (1989) not a judicial power as not considering a dispute or controversy

Ryan affair (late 80’s)– AG refused to execute warrant on basis of deprivation of right to fair trial and prejudicial comments by politicians – ultra vires?
Wheeler v Culligan (1989)
Not a judicial power as not considering a dispute or controversy
Independence
Taoiseach can request resignation of AG, and if AG refuses, President can terminate (Art.30.5.3)

Indicates may take position different from government (Independence)

Resigns once new AG appointed under new Taoiseach (Lack of independence)

Required to act independently of the government in suing to defend the unborn (AG v X [1992]) (Independence)
AG (SPUC) v Open Door Counselling (1988)
Guardian of Constitution “public interests are committed to the care of the AG”: can sue to restrain unlawful act, vindicate constitutional right, prevent corruption public morals.

Traditional function of AG to represent executive and public at large
SPUC v Coogan (1989)
Duty of defending the Constitution and vindicating Constitutional rights
Public Rights
Campus Oil (No.2) (1983) – defying a statutory order made in public interest- appropriate person to defend public interest is AG

Crotty (1987) and SPUC v Coogan (1989) people can ALSO sue in public interest thus role defunct? See locus standi (c.8)
Relator Actions
Brought into proceedings to cure locus standi (no individual harm) consent given to issue proceedings in name of AG (person = relator)
Law Society v Carroll [1995]
Only AG can sue to uphold a public right