Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
6 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
|
Saltman Engineering Co v Campbell Engineering Co
Woodward v Hutchins
AG v Observer |
CI must not be something of public knowledge and property
Must not be in PD
C = destroyed when enters PD |
Confidential info |
|
|
Andrew Gray v NGN
AG v Observer
Fraser v Thames TV
Shelley Films v Rex
Mosley v Newsgroup Newspapers
Douglas v Hello |
C Commercial info - business relationship
Government info
TV show/ideas
Costume/design for film set
Sadomasochistic acts for money
CI as property - no propriety rights in info in photos |
Confidential info |
|
|
Coco v Clarke
Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler
Robb v Green
Terrapin Ltd v Builders Supply Co |
OT - reasonable man realise info C? Impact on conscience of person?
Employees must not use/disclose CI/trade secrets
After employment - prevent making customer lists
Springboard doctrine - prevent person who BC from getting a head start |
Confidential obligation |
|
|
3 elements?
1?
2? Coco v Clarke & Thomas v Pearce
3? Cornelius v De Taranto |
1 = used of disclosed the CI
2 = info obtained directly/indirectly CC - RP info subject to obligation TP - careless/stupidity won't suffice
3 = use/disclosure went beyond the purpose which info was confided |
Unauthorised use/disclosure |
|
|
Public interest
Cases? |
PI outweigh confidentiality
Lion Laboratories v Evans
Spycatcher case - 'pressing social need' |
Defences |
|
|
Article 8?
Article 10? |
Right to respect for private and family life
Freedom of expression |
Human rights |
