• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/26

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

26 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Classical Conditioning

associations are formed between two external stimuli (CS->US). No response is required for the animal to receive the US (e.g., Tone->Food)

Instrumental Conditioning aka Operant

The strength of the associations are strengthened or weakened based on the consequences of the animals goal-directed behavior

Thorndike's Puzzle Box

Put kittens in puzzle box w/ reinforcement outside of box (salmon etc.) & kitten had to figure out how to get out of box & they’d time them to see how long it would take.




Results:cat would get faster & faster at getting out of box; trial and error

Law of Effect

•If a response to a stimulus is followed by a satisfying event (reinforcement), the response is strengthened.




•If a response to a stimulus is followed by an annoying event (punishment), the response is weakened.

Procedures to studying Instrumental Conditioning (2) & Describe them.

-Discrete Trial Procedure: Instrumental response is performed only once (e.g., maze experiments)




-Free-Operant Procedure: Instrumental response can be performed in a continuous manner (many times over again)

Necessary training components (2) & Describe them.

•Magazine training : Stimulus repeatedly paired with the reinforcer to show animal to go get reinforcer when presented




•Shaping: Reinforcements of successive approximations

Appetitive stimulus vs. Aversive stimulus

Appetitive: pleasant outcome


Aversive: unpleasant outcome

Positive Reinforcement




Negative Reinforcement

+: produces an appetitive (pleasant) stimulus; increase in response rate




-: eliminates or prevents the occurence of an aversive (unpleasant) stimulus; increase in response rate

Positive Punishment




Negative Punishment AKA Omission training (DRO)

+: produces an aversive (unpleasant) stimulus; decrease in response rate




-: eliminates or prevents the occurence of an appetitive stimulus (pleasant); decrease in response rate

Fundamental elements of Instrumental Conditioning (3)

•Instrumental Response


•Outcome


•Contingency between the response and outcome

Behavioral Variability vs Stereotypy


(in Instrumental response)

–Sterotyped responses: the same response is required to get the outcome over a number of trials




–Variable responses: different responses on each trial are necessary to get the outcome.

Yoked

relating to or being a control organism or group that is subjected to stimuli at the same time or on the same schedule as the subject of an experiment

Belongingness

–Certain responses belong with the reinforcer because of the animal’s evolutionary history.

Instinctive Drift

Response deteriorated and other “instinctive” behaviors would “drift” in and interfere with performance of the operant response

Quantity & Quality of Reinforcer

the quality and quantity of a reinforcer are variables that would be expected to determine the effectiveness of positive reinforcement

The Crespi effect

Behavioral-contrast can occur either because of a shift from a prior reward magnitude or because of an anticipated reward.




Ex. In a repeatedly carried out task such as finding food in a maze, the running speed of the rat is proportional to the size of the reward it obtained on the previous trial

Two types of Relationships between a response and a reinforcer & Describe them.

-Temporal Relation: refers to the time between the response & reinforcer




-Temporal Contiguity: refers to the delivery of the reinforcer immediately after the response.

•Why is responding so sensitive to a delayof reinforcement?

–Delay makes it difficult to determine which response is reinforced

Two ways to overcome delay in reinforcement

-A secondary reinforcer AKA conditioned reinforcer




-Marking procedure

A secondary reinforcer

A conditioned stimulus that was previously associated with the reinforcer




E.g., when training your dog, you might yell “good boy” when a desired behavior is done prior to giving your dog a treat.

Marking Procedure

Learning to lever press with a 30sec. delay between the bar press and the delivery of food




No Signal: No marker Stimulus was presented


Marking: Light was presented for 5 sec. after the bar press.


Blocking: Light was presented for 5 sec. right before delivery of food.

The Response-Reinforcer Contingency

Refers to the extent to which the delivery of the reinforcer depends on the prior occurencce of the instrumental response.




-effects the controllability of reinforcers

The Triadic Design (used in studies of the learned-helplessness effect)

The Learned Helpless HYPOTHESIS

-assumes that during exposure to uncontrollable shocks, animals learn that the shocks are independent from their behavior-that there is nothing they could do to control the shocks (lack of control)




-there is motivational loss

The Learned-Helplessness EFFECT

pattern of results obtained w/ the triadic design (disruption of instrumental conditioning caused by prior exposure to the inescapable shock[in ex])

Results when challenging to Learned-Helplessness HYPOTHESIS

So, learning deficit is not due to lack of control, as suggested by the learned-helplessness hypothesis, butrather, it’s due to a lack of predictability.