• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/56

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

56 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Palsgraf v Long Island Rail Road
if an effect is so far removed from the cause, then nobody is to blame
Marbury v Madison
then an act conflicts with the Constitution, the act is invalid (the rule of judicial review)
Ingram v Wright
corporal punishment can be used in public schools BUT, it must be accepted by the school board and parents must be given the opportunity to opt out by written request
Bethel v Fraiser
When in schools, students do not have absolute first amendment rights
Pico v Island Trees
just because the school board doesn't like certain books doesn't mean that they can remove them from school
Tinker v Des Moines
Schools can censor anything that disrupts the educational process
Fredericks v Morse
educators may supress student speech @ a school sponsored event that is reasonably viewed as promoting drug use or violating the school code
Redding v Stafford
a strip search of a middle schooll student is unconstitutional when the school lackks reasons to suspect that the drugs presented a danger or that they were concealed or that they were concealed in her underwear
Simmons v Roper
the death sentence is unconstitutional for juviniles
4th Amendment
guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.
5th Amendment
protects against self incrimination and double jeporady
6th Amendment
the right to an attorney
7th amendment
civil cases have juries
8th amendment
protection against excessive bail and crual and unusual punishment
14th amendment
the right to duue process of law (fair treatment)
article 3 sec. 2
trial by jury
Art. 4 sec. 1
the rulings of courts in one state are good in all states
Palsgraf v Long Island Rail Road
if an effect is so far removed from the cause, then nobody is to blame
Marbury v Madison
then an act conflicts with the Constitution, the act is invalid (the rule of judicial review)
Ingram v Wright
corporal punishment can be used in public schools BUT, it must be accepted by the school board and parents must be given the opportunity to opt out by written request
Bethel v Fraiser
When in schools, students do not have absolute first amendment rights
Pico v Island Trees
just because the school board doesn't like certain books doesn't mean that they can remove them from school
Tinker v Des Moines
Schools can censor anything that disrupts the educational process
Fredericks v Morse
educators may supress student speech @ a school sponsored event that is reasonably viewed as promoting drug use or violating the school code
Redding v Stafford
a strip search of a middle schooll student is unconstitutional when the school lackks reasons to suspect that the drugs presented a danger or that they were concealed or that they were concealed in her underwear
Simmons v Roper
the death sentence is unconstitutional for juviniles
4th Amendment
guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.
5th Amendment
protects against self incrimination and double jeporady
6th Amendment
the right to an attorney
7th amendment
civil cases have juries
8th amendment
protection against excessive bail and crual and unusual punishment
14th amendment
the right to duue process of law (fair treatment)
article 3 sec. 2
trial by jury
Art. 4 sec. 1
the rulings of courts in one state are good in all states
Massie Vs Henry
Schools can't control hair
Dale Vs Boy scouts
Boy scouts can discriminate casue they're private
Bakke Vs Ca
No Quotas
Fredricks Vs. Morse
schools can punish if you have drug related thigns associated with the school
Gratz Vs Bollinger
subjective college apps
Ingram Vs Wright
corpral punishment allowed in public schools but parents can opt out
Kyllo Vs Us
you can use sense enhancing devices not sense creating ones
Us Vs sokolow
if you're profiled at an airport as a terriortist but they find drugs it's legal
Illinios Vs Caballas
Police can use drug sniffing dogs at a traffic stop if it doesn't prolong it
Terry vs Ohio
suspicion is ok to search for weapons
NY vs Belton
anytime you're arrested they can search you can your car
MN vs Dickerson
if you're patted down for weapons and they find drugs it's legal
AZ vs Grant
1. Anytime sfatey is involved cops can search you

2. Arrest must relate to search
Florida vs JL
Police can't search/arrest on anonymos callers but they can check the suspect out
IL vs Wardlow
if you run from cops they have probable cause
US vs Weeks
If evidence is seized illegally it can't be used in court
Mapp Vs OH
Exclusionary rule (Us vs Weeks) counts for all states
Us vs Chimmel
you can only search things in the immediate vacinity of the arrested person
Maryland vs Wilson
Anytime you're pulled over you have to get out of the car if asked
Mapp Vs OH
Exclusionary rule (Us vs Weeks) counts for all states
Us vs Chimmel
you can only search things in the immediate vacinity of the arrested person
Maryland vs Wilson
Anytime you're pulled over you have to get out of the car if asked