• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/14

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

14 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

The Republican Period (1789-1868)

1. Federal Power was to be feared.


2. individuals were close to their state governments. #state pride.


The Classical Period (1868-1937)

1. The federal government became the protector instead of the states. #newdealera #reconstruction.

The Modern Liberal Period (1937-Present)

1. Huge expansion in federal power at this time.


2. Commerce Clause expands here.

Republican Form of Government

1. Harkens back to ancient Rome.


2. the state exists for the benefit of the people.


3. Direct Democracy

Liberal Theory of Government

1. Emphasis on Limited Government


2. Government was a necessary evil



Federalists ( rich, white landowners)

1. Proponents of the Constitution


2. James Madison, John J, and Alexander Hamilton.


3. Checks and balances, separation of powers, in favor of the senate.

Antifederalists (salt of the earth southerners)

1. They wanted direct, Jeffersonian Democracy


2. majoritarian rule


3. they disliked the senate (house of lords)


4. hated the commerce clause (too broad)

Things the Antifederalists didn't like about the Constitution:

1. they didn't like the removal of the people from the process


2. they didn't like the creation of a powerful, remote federal government.


3. hated the new emphasis on commerce.

Federalist Papers

1. Federalist propaganda for a central government.

Marbury v. Madison

Topic: Judicial Review


Hint: midnight Judges


Rule: in order for Marshall to create judicial review by declaring Section 13 of the judiciary Act (which tried to expand original jurisdiction of the supreme court).

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld

Topic: Executive and the war on terror

Hint: American citizen captured in Afghanistan was held as an enemy combatant.

Holding: court held his detention was lawful.Reasoning:The Court found that is must approach this case by balancing the tension of individual rights and national security interests

Massachusetts v. EPA

Topic: Standing


Rule: In order to have standing to sue in a federal court the petitioner must have; injury in fact, causation, and redressability in the claim, these elements are easier to meet if you are a State rather than an individual.

Ripeness

Art. III requires that there be present injury or an imminent threat of injury. In determining if a case is ripe, consider the effect of delay on plaintiffs, the effect of judicial intervention on administrative actors, whether courts would benefit from delay.

Mootness

Art. III requires dismissal of a case when, because of changes, the court’s determination of the legal issue cannot have any practical effect in achieving the desired result.