Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
9 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Selex v Commission
|
Adopting standard and producing them for air traffic control systems are legitimate state activities- Art 101 does not apply to government contracts.
|
|
|
Viho Europe BV v. Commission
|
If action was unilateral and not part of an agreement between undertakings this will not infringe competition law.
|
|
|
ICI v Commission
|
Many examples of simultaneous price rises over time- circumstantial evidence of a cartel.
|
|
|
Consten & Grundid
|
The agreement need only be CAPABLE of affecting trade- widened the scope of the article.
|
|
|
Matra Hachette v. Commission
|
There are no agreements which are specifically illegal- this is within the interpretation of DGComp
|
|
|
Virgin/ BA
|
A share of 39.7% of the market can be counted as dominance if other players have relatively small share.
|
|
|
United Brands
Three Kinds of markets |
Product- banana or soft fruit market?
Geographic market- Excluded the UK, France and Italy- but still dominance of geographic market Temporal Market- UB was only dominant at certain times (not during summer) |
|
|
National Panasonic v. Commission
|
Fines for not opening door, not answering questions etc
|
|
|
AM&S Europe Ltd v Commission
|
Legal privilege does not apply for 'in house' lawyers
|
