Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
21 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
history of groups
|
1.Moreno - term 'group psychotherapy' coined in 20's
2. Lewin - field theory concepts and T-group movement in U.S. 3. Gestalt approach - perls - brought to interest to groups 4. Deming, quality work groups to improve processes and to build morale with workers. 5. Schutz and Gibb- emphasized humanistic approach to T-groups - personal growth as goal 6. Rogers, developed encounter group that became basis for growth oriented groups |
|
Psychodrama
|
Moreno...memebers participate in unrehearsed role play with group leader as director
|
|
T-Groups
|
T= training. Evolved from a focus on task to a primary emphasis on interpersonal relationships - similar to family therapy - interested in group as whole, as well as individuals
|
|
Encounter group
|
emerged from t-groups. with an attempt to focus on grouwth of individual not group as whole. Focus on individual expression and recognition of affect.
|
|
Group Marathons
|
an extended one session group that breaks down defensive barriers that individuals may otehrwise use.
|
|
Self-help/support groups
|
Self help group usually develops sponteneuosly, focuses on one topic with little formal training. Supoprt groups are similar but usually have someone trained.
|
|
Counseling and Psychotgherapy group myths:
|
1. artificial and unreal, 2. second rate strucutres for dealing with problems, 3. force people to lose their identity, 4. require people to become very emotional, 5. toucy-feely, confrontational, and hostile - they are brainwashing
|
|
Def. of a group
|
2 or more people working together to to achieve a goal for of mutual benefit
|
|
Theraputic Factors within groups
|
-installation of hope, universality, imparting of info, altruism, corrective recapulatio of the primary family group, dev. of socializing techniques, imitaative behavior, interpersonal learning, group cohesiveness, catharsis, existential factors
|
|
benefits and drawbacks of groups:
|
can help high-schoolers learn social problem solving behaviors, can promote career dev., can improve functioning and well being, help deal better w/ stressors in life, increase maturity processes.
Disadvantage: some peopel and some problems aren't suited for groups. May lapse in groupthink mentality |
|
Psychoeducational groups
|
guidance or educational groups that preventive and instructive. Help people to deal with potential threats, developmental life events`, or immediate life crisis.
|
|
Counseling groups
|
interpersonal problem solving groups. Non severe career, educational, personal, social, and developmental concerns are addressed. More direct then psychoeducational groups and is condcutred in a smaller more intimate space.
|
|
Psychotherapy groups
|
personality reconstruction groups - help individual members remediate indepth psychological problems. - often used in inpatient facilities
|
|
Task/work groups
|
help members apply the processes of group dynamics to improve practiecs. Run best when:
purpose of group is clear to everyone, process and content are balanced, time taken for culture builing and learning about one anotehr. Conflict is addressed, feedback b/n members, attention to the here and now, reflection on what has happened |
|
3 factors to consider in groups when trying to choose a theoretical perspective
|
do i need a theoretical base to conduct this group? 2, what uses will the theory best serve? 3. what criteria employed in selection process?
|
|
Staging in groups
|
1. Formation - foundation layed, members express their anxieties, etc.
2. Storming - turmoil and conflict usually occur. 3. Norming - having survived storming the group has more enthusiasm and cohesion. 4. Adjourning or mourning stage - group comes to end |
|
Issues that potential members should clarify before entering a group
|
clear statement of groups purpose, group fomat, rules, and procedures. statement about edu. and training, disclosure about risks involved, discussion about limitations of confidentiality
|
|
Group size and duration
|
determined by purpose and preference = they affect one another though.
|
|
Open vs. close ended gruops
|
open = admit people after group has started.
|
|
Reccomendations for feedback
|
should be beneficial to the reciever, based on describable behavior, positive better then negative, most effective when follows a stimulus behavior and is validated by others, better when reciever is open and trusts the giver
|
|
4 leadership qualities that have a pos. effect on groups
|
Caring, 2. meaning attribute, emotional simulation, executive function
|