Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
126 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Roles
|
a set of norms that applies to a specific subclass within society
|
|
Expected vs.
|
Enacted
|
|
Expected Role
|
Parents, Teachers, Pastor
|
|
Enacted
|
Leader, follower, christian
|
|
Role Conflict
|
Inter-role and Intrarole
|
|
Interrole Conflict
|
occupying two or more roles that entail contradictory expectations about a given behavior. Ex: friend and test proctor saw friend cheating should tell or just be quiet.
|
|
Intrarole conflict
|
Contradictory expectations concerning a single role
Ex. Children and parents |
|
Dialects
|
Relationships in terms of contradictory expectations that create tension between two people.
1.Autonomy/Connection (Ex: Parents vs me 2.Certainty/Uncertainty ( certainty some one will "be there" 3.Openness/Closedness ( very revealing of personal info and then concealing all of your feelings. |
|
Autonomy/Connection
|
The need to be independent and dependent in our interpersonal relationships is dynamic and frequently. Ex: parents vs. me (we pull)
|
|
Certainty/ Uncertainty
|
-Certainty that someone will "be there"
- We seek excitement and spontaneity in our relationship. |
|
Openess/Closedness
|
-Being open responsive and willing to disclose information (reveal)
-Also have a need to conceal or keep our feelings to ourselves |
|
Five most important characteristics of appropriate self-disclosure.
|
-it is a function of the ongoing relationship
-it occurs reciprocally -it is timed to fit what is happening -it is timed to fit what is happening -it concerns what is going on within and between persons present -It moves by small increments |
|
When you tell others about personal life
|
it fosters trust
|
|
Love Styles
|
-Eros, Ludus, Storge, Pragma, Mania, Agape
|
|
Eros
|
-"love at first sight"
-passion -intense |
|
Ludus
|
-"playing the field"
-Game playing -deception |
|
Storge
|
-"down to earth, though not passionate"
-Friendship -Committed |
|
Pragma
|
-Practical
-Matches traits |
|
Mania
|
"self-doubt and uncertainty about other person."
"jealousy and emotional" -possessive -dependent |
|
Agape
|
Self-less, "all giving love"
|
|
Social Science Approach
(Psych, Socio) |
-assumes that behavior can be --observed, measured and predicted
- primary interest is in describing and comparing cultures. -Approach to studying culture |
|
Interpretive Approach
(lingustics, Anthropology) |
-Goal is to understand rather than predict behavior.
-Takes perspective from within a culture. - Communication is seen as creating and maintain. |
|
Clinical Approach
|
-Concerned with the creating change by examining power relationships within cultures
-Ex: women's role in life - goal is not to just understnd behvaior, but creating change. |
|
Individualism
|
"I" FOR IDENTITY
-Emphasis on individual goals - Little difference between in-group, out group communicatoion -saying what you are thinking |
|
Collectivism
|
-Emphasis on in-group's goals
- fitting into in group - avoiding confrontations in in-group -"we" identity |
|
High-Context
|
-More skilled in reading non-verbal behaviors
-speak les, listen more -indirect and less explicit, assume that other people also be able to do so -ex: China, japan, south korea |
|
Social Science Approach
(Psych, Socio) |
-assumes that behavior can be --observed, measured and predicted
- primary interest is in describing and comparing cultures. -Approach to studying culture |
|
Low-Context
|
-Stress direct and explicit communication
- Emphasize verbal communication Ex:US, Canada, Germany |
|
Interpretive Approach
(lingustics, Anthropology) |
-Goal is to understand rather than predict behavior.
-Takes perspective from within a culture. - Communication is seen as creating and maintain. |
|
Clinical Approach
|
-Concerned with the creating change by examining power relationships within cultures
-Ex: women's role in life - goal is not to just understnd behvaior, but creating change. |
|
Masculinity
|
Masculin cultures value work, strength, competition and assertiveness. Ex:japan, Australia, Venezuela
|
|
Individualism
|
"I" FOR IDENTITY
-Emphasis on individual goals - Little difference between in-group, out group communicatoion -saying what you are thinking |
|
Femininity
|
Cultures valuetraits such as compassion nurturing, and interpersonal relationships.
|
|
Social Science Approach
(Psych, Socio) |
-assumes that behavior can be --observed, measured and predicted
- primary interest is in describing and comparing cultures. -Approach to studying culture |
|
Interpretive Approach
(lingustics, Anthropology) |
-Goal is to understand rather than predict behavior.
-Takes perspective from within a culture. - Communication is seen as creating and maintain. |
|
Collectivism
|
-Emphasis on in-group's goals
- fitting into in group - avoiding confrontations in in-group -"we" identity |
|
Ethnocentrism
|
Refers to putting one's "nation" at the center
|
|
Clinical Approach
|
-Concerned with the creating change by examining power relationships within cultures
-Ex: women's role in life - goal is not to just understnd behvaior, but creating change. |
|
High-Context
|
-More skilled in reading non-verbal behaviors
-speak les, listen more -indirect and less explicit, assume that other people also be able to do so -ex: China, japan, south korea |
|
Low-Context
|
-Stress direct and explicit communication
- Emphasize verbal communication Ex:US, Canada, Germany |
|
Social Science Approach
(Psych, Socio) |
-assumes that behavior can be --observed, measured and predicted
- primary interest is in describing and comparing cultures. -Approach to studying culture |
|
Social Science Approach
(Psych, Socio) |
-assumes that behavior can be --observed, measured and predicted
- primary interest is in describing and comparing cultures. -Approach to studying culture |
|
Masculinity
|
Masculin cultures value work, strength, competition and assertiveness. Ex:japan, Australia, Venezuela
|
|
Individualism
|
"I" FOR IDENTITY
-Emphasis on individual goals - Little difference between in-group, out group communicatoion -saying what you are thinking |
|
Interpretive Approach
(lingustics, Anthropology) |
-Goal is to understand rather than predict behavior.
-Takes perspective from within a culture. - Communication is seen as creating and maintain. |
|
Interpretive Approach
(lingustics, Anthropology) |
-Goal is to understand rather than predict behavior.
-Takes perspective from within a culture. - Communication is seen as creating and maintain. |
|
Femininity
|
Cultures valuetraits such as compassion nurturing, and interpersonal relationships.
|
|
Clinical Approach
|
-Concerned with the creating change by examining power relationships within cultures
-Ex: women's role in life - goal is not to just understnd behvaior, but creating change. |
|
Collectivism
|
-Emphasis on in-group's goals
- fitting into in group - avoiding confrontations in in-group -"we" identity |
|
Clinical Approach
|
-Concerned with the creating change by examining power relationships within cultures
-Ex: women's role in life - goal is not to just understnd behvaior, but creating change. |
|
High-Context
|
-More skilled in reading non-verbal behaviors
-speak les, listen more -indirect and less explicit, assume that other people also be able to do so -ex: China, japan, south korea |
|
Individualism
|
"I" FOR IDENTITY
-Emphasis on individual goals - Little difference between in-group, out group communicatoion -saying what you are thinking |
|
Individualism
|
"I" FOR IDENTITY
-Emphasis on individual goals - Little difference between in-group, out group communicatoion -saying what you are thinking |
|
Ethnocentrism
|
Refers to putting one's "nation" at the center
|
|
Low-Context
|
-Stress direct and explicit communication
- Emphasize verbal communication Ex:US, Canada, Germany |
|
Collectivism
|
-Emphasis on in-group's goals
- fitting into in group - avoiding confrontations in in-group -"we" identity |
|
Collectivism
|
-Emphasis on in-group's goals
- fitting into in group - avoiding confrontations in in-group -"we" identity |
|
Masculinity
|
Masculin cultures value work, strength, competition and assertiveness. Ex:japan, Australia, Venezuela
|
|
High-Context
|
-More skilled in reading non-verbal behaviors
-speak les, listen more -indirect and less explicit, assume that other people also be able to do so -ex: China, japan, south korea |
|
High-Context
|
-More skilled in reading non-verbal behaviors
-speak les, listen more -indirect and less explicit, assume that other people also be able to do so -ex: China, japan, south korea |
|
Femininity
|
Cultures valuetraits such as compassion nurturing, and interpersonal relationships.
|
|
Social Science Approach
(Psych, Socio) |
-assumes that behavior can be --observed, measured and predicted
- primary interest is in describing and comparing cultures. -Approach to studying culture |
|
Low-Context
|
-Stress direct and explicit communication
- Emphasize verbal communication Ex:US, Canada, Germany |
|
Low-Context
|
-Stress direct and explicit communication
- Emphasize verbal communication Ex:US, Canada, Germany |
|
Masculinity
|
Masculin cultures value work, strength, competition and assertiveness. Ex:japan, Australia, Venezuela
|
|
Ethnocentrism
|
Refers to putting one's "nation" at the center
|
|
Interpretive Approach
(lingustics, Anthropology) |
-Goal is to understand rather than predict behavior.
-Takes perspective from within a culture. - Communication is seen as creating and maintain. |
|
Femininity
|
Cultures valuetraits such as compassion nurturing, and interpersonal relationships.
|
|
Masculinity
|
Masculin cultures value work, strength, competition and assertiveness. Ex:japan, Australia, Venezuela
|
|
Clinical Approach
|
-Concerned with the creating change by examining power relationships within cultures
-Ex: women's role in life - goal is not to just understnd behvaior, but creating change. |
|
Ethnocentrism
|
Refers to putting one's "nation" at the center
|
|
Femininity
|
Cultures valuetraits such as compassion nurturing, and interpersonal relationships.
|
|
Individualism
|
"I" FOR IDENTITY
-Emphasis on individual goals - Little difference between in-group, out group communicatoion -saying what you are thinking |
|
Collectivism
|
-Emphasis on in-group's goals
- fitting into in group - avoiding confrontations in in-group -"we" identity |
|
Ethnocentrism
|
Refers to putting one's "nation" at the center
|
|
High-Context
|
-More skilled in reading non-verbal behaviors
-speak les, listen more -indirect and less explicit, assume that other people also be able to do so -ex: China, japan, south korea |
|
Low-Context
|
-Stress direct and explicit communication
- Emphasize verbal communication Ex:US, Canada, Germany |
|
Masculinity
|
Masculin cultures value work, strength, competition and assertiveness. Ex:japan, Australia, Venezuela
|
|
Femininity
|
Cultures valuetraits such as compassion nurturing, and interpersonal relationships.
|
|
Ethnocentrism
|
Refers to putting one's "nation" at the center
|
|
Social Science Approach
(Psych, Socio) |
-assumes that behavior can be --observed, measured and predicted
- primary interest is in describing and comparing cultures. -Approach to studying culture |
|
Interpretive Approach
(lingustics, Anthropology) |
-Goal is to understand rather than predict behavior.
-Takes perspective from within a culture. - Communication is seen as creating and maintain. |
|
Clinical Approach
|
-Concerned with the creating change by examining power relationships within cultures
-Ex: women's role in life - goal is not to just understnd behvaior, but creating change. |
|
Social Science Approach
(Psych, Socio) |
-assumes that behavior can be --observed, measured and predicted
- primary interest is in describing and comparing cultures. -Approach to studying culture |
|
Individualism
|
"I" FOR IDENTITY
-Emphasis on individual goals - Little difference between in-group, out group communicatoion -saying what you are thinking |
|
Social Science Approach
(Psych, Socio) |
-assumes that behavior can be --observed, measured and predicted
- primary interest is in describing and comparing cultures. -Approach to studying culture |
|
Collectivism
|
-Emphasis on in-group's goals
- fitting into in group - avoiding confrontations in in-group -"we" identity |
|
Interpretive Approach
(lingustics, Anthropology) |
-Goal is to understand rather than predict behavior.
-Takes perspective from within a culture. - Communication is seen as creating and maintain. |
|
Interpretive Approach
(lingustics, Anthropology) |
-Goal is to understand rather than predict behavior.
-Takes perspective from within a culture. - Communication is seen as creating and maintain. |
|
High-Context
|
-More skilled in reading non-verbal behaviors
-speak les, listen more -indirect and less explicit, assume that other people also be able to do so -ex: China, japan, south korea |
|
Clinical Approach
|
-Concerned with the creating change by examining power relationships within cultures
-Ex: women's role in life - goal is not to just understnd behvaior, but creating change. |
|
Clinical Approach
|
-Concerned with the creating change by examining power relationships within cultures
-Ex: women's role in life - goal is not to just understnd behvaior, but creating change. |
|
Low-Context
|
-Stress direct and explicit communication
- Emphasize verbal communication Ex:US, Canada, Germany |
|
Individualism
|
"I" FOR IDENTITY
-Emphasis on individual goals - Little difference between in-group, out group communicatoion -saying what you are thinking |
|
Individualism
|
"I" FOR IDENTITY
-Emphasis on individual goals - Little difference between in-group, out group communicatoion -saying what you are thinking |
|
Collectivism
|
-Emphasis on in-group's goals
- fitting into in group - avoiding confrontations in in-group -"we" identity |
|
Masculinity
|
Masculin cultures value work, strength, competition and assertiveness. Ex:japan, Australia, Venezuela
|
|
Collectivism
|
-Emphasis on in-group's goals
- fitting into in group - avoiding confrontations in in-group -"we" identity |
|
High-Context
|
-More skilled in reading non-verbal behaviors
-speak les, listen more -indirect and less explicit, assume that other people also be able to do so -ex: China, japan, south korea |
|
Femininity
|
Cultures valuetraits such as compassion nurturing, and interpersonal relationships.
|
|
High-Context
|
-More skilled in reading non-verbal behaviors
-speak les, listen more -indirect and less explicit, assume that other people also be able to do so -ex: China, japan, south korea |
|
Low-Context
|
-Stress direct and explicit communication
- Emphasize verbal communication Ex:US, Canada, Germany |
|
Ethnocentrism
|
Refers to putting one's "nation" at the center
|
|
Low-Context
|
-Stress direct and explicit communication
- Emphasize verbal communication Ex:US, Canada, Germany |
|
Masculinity
|
Masculin cultures value work, strength, competition and assertiveness. Ex:japan, Australia, Venezuela
|
|
Femininity
|
Cultures valuetraits such as compassion nurturing, and interpersonal relationships.
|
|
Masculinity
|
Masculin cultures value work, strength, competition and assertiveness. Ex:japan, Australia, Venezuela
|
|
Femininity
|
Cultures valuetraits such as compassion nurturing, and interpersonal relationships.
|
|
Ethnocentrism
|
Refers to putting one's "nation" at the center
|
|
Ethnocentrism
|
Refers to putting one's "nation" at the center
|
|
Stereotyping
|
A generalization about a class of people, object, and events that is widely held by given culture.
|
|
DEFENSIVE PROJECTION !!!!!!! 333-335
|
DEFENSIVE PROJECTION !!!!!!! 333-335
|
|
Conformity Pressure
|
Person makes initial judgement but then conforms with the groups philosophy due to Peer Pressure
|
|
Social Comparison
|
All humans have a need to evaluate their own opinions and abilities and that when they cannot then they side with those of other people.
|
|
Forming
|
-Learn Task
-Do i fit in? -Member Quality? -In or out? -Build solidarity |
|
Storming
|
Direct speech, loose identity, Comm. Failures, Control Issue, Affection Issues
|
|
Norming
|
Balance, goals, roles, group cohesion, one unit
|
|
Performing
|
Consensus, productivity, high spirits, withdrawal
|
|
Wheel
|
Most centralized of the four networks, it produces the best organized and fast performancet
|
|
Chain
|
3 people communicate with one on either side of them, but two people can only communicate one person on their side
|
|
Storming
|
Direct speech, loose identity, Comm. Failures, Control Issue, Affection Issues
|
|
Norming
|
Balance, goals, roles, group cohesion, one unit
|
|
Performing
|
Consensus, productivity, high spirits, withdrawal
|
|
Wheel
|
Most centralized of the four networks, it produces the best organized and fast performancet
|
|
Chain
|
3 people communicate with one on either side of them, but two people can only communicate one person on their side
|
|
Six common Difficulties that small groups encountering certain contexts
|
-Group objectives are not clearly stated or agreed upon
-Group members do not come up with enough ideas -The group does not carry through discussion of each issue until it is resolved -Members rarely help one another -Conflict between members becomes so intense that it is counterproductive -Conclusions are not reached or agreed upon |