• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/22

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

22 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What is Ting-Toomey's definition of culture?
o “a learned system of traditions, symbolic patterns, and accumulative meanings that fosters a particular sense of shared identity-hood, community-hood, and communication rituals among the aggregate of its group members
What implications do culture-based dimensions have on conflict management?
o Individualism
• Emphasizes “. . . ‘I’ identity over the ‘we’ identity, individuals’ rights over group interests, and individuated-focused emotions over social-focused emotions” (p. 145)
o Collectivism
• Emphasizes “ . . . ‘we’ identity over the ‘I’ identity, in-group interests over individual desires, and other-identity concerns over self-identity concerns” (p. 145).
o Power Distance
• Small power distance:
 Equal power
 Symmetrical relations
 Mixture of positive and negative messages
 Equal rewards
• Large power distance:
 Unequal power
 Asymmetrical relations
 Authoritative feedback
 Rewards based on status
o Self construal
“one’s self-image and is composed of an independent and interdependent self” (p. 150)
• Face: identity respect and other-identity consideration issues
• Independent self-construal positively associated with self-face concern and the use of dominating/competing conflict strategies
• Interdependent self-construal positively associated with other-face concern and the use of avoiding and integrative conflict tactics
• Mutual face concern: Concern for both people’s face.
self-constual
one’s self-image and is composed of the independent and an interdependent self. Independent construal of self- involves the view that an individual is a unique entity with an individuated repertoire of feeling, cognitions, and motivations. Interdependent construal of self- involves an emphasis on the importance of relational or in-group connectedness.
o Cross Ethnic Style
• African Americans
 Conflict styles are influenced simultaneously by both individualistic and collectivist value tendencies, and also by both small and large power distance value patterns.
o Cross Ethnic Style:
• Asian Americans
 The philosophy of Confucianism strongly influences proper face work rituals and conflict interaction performance.
 Tend to use avoiding or obliging conflict styles to deal with the conflict at hand.
o Cross Ethnic Style:
• Latinos
 Tactfulness and considerateness are conveyed through the use of other-oriented face work behaviors such as the use of obliging or “smoothing over” conflict styles and the use of the avoidance conflict style.
o Cross Ethnic Style:
• Native Americans
 Tend to prefer the use of verbal self-restraint and a verbal self-discipline mode in uncertainty conflict situations.
Distal and Proximal influences and outcomes
o Distal factors include:
• culture, gender, and relationship history
o Proximal factors include:
• goals, rules, emotions, and attributions
• Distal and Proximal Outcomes
o Proximal outcomes:
• reference integrative tactics
o Distal outcomes:
• concerns how over time conflict affects organizational culture
Three Phases of conflict
o Phase 1: Differentiation
• Involves raising issue and points of disagreement
 Communicative key: Information sharing (giving and receiving)

o Phase 2: Mutual Problem Description
• Involves getting both parties to agree on a mutually acceptable definition of the problem
 Without this, solutions very difficult
 Communicative key: compromise

o Phase 3: Integration
• Involves displaying cooperative tactics
• Generating alternative solutions
• Evaluating positive and negative aspects of each solution
• Selecting and clarifying the solution to be implemented
• Establishing a monitoring system to determine if solution is effective
Four contexts of organizational conflict
o Interpersonal
o Bargaining and Negotiation
o Intergroup
o Interorganizational
Impact of conflict on children
o Parent-Toddler: Primary concern is how toddler uses communication to gain control of social world.
o Parent-Adolescent: Primary concern is how adolescent gains control over personal world.
o Constructive conflicts
• People listen to each other’s perspectives, regulate their emotions, and create mutually satisfying solutions
 Involve empathetic understanding and effective social support
o Destructive conflicts
• Often prolonged and recurrent
 Involve coercive and avoidant strategies
• Examples: demand-withdraw patterns, Gottman’s four horsemen, negativity, aggression, and violence
o Interparental conflict’s adverse effects on children
o Focus needs to be on frequency, topics, intensity, types, and duration of conflict
• Parent Child Conflict
o Previous research
• Power differences in parent-child conflict
 Parent attempting to gain child’s compliance
 Studied from a unilateral approach (i.e., how parents’ behavior influences children’s behavior)
o Current research
• Studied from a bidirectional approach
• Source of Conflict
o Self-serving bias
• Individuals tend to attribute constructive conflict acts to themselves, whereas they attribute negative intent and destructive outcome to others
 Interdependency among people’s perceptions and their subsequent conflict behaviors
 The importance of perspective-taking
• Parenting Style
o Baumrind (1966):
• Authoritative parents
 Balance high nurturance with control and clear communication about what is required of the child
 Authoritarian parents
 Dogmatic, strict, and lack warmth and reasoning with their children
 Permissive parents
 Lack control and effective monitoring by either neglecting or indulging their children
• Children’s Conflict/Aggression
o Spillover effect
• Children’s externalizing behaviors (e.g., aggression, acting out, engaging in risky behaviors) corresponds with a decline in marital satisfaction
 Greater interparental conflict can result in more problem behaviors from children, which in turn can increase interparental conflict
• Conflict effects
o Sibling relationships
• Described as a love-hate or emotionally ambivalent relationship

 Sibling conflict typically increases with the transition to adolescence, but decreases over time
• What myths are associated with common couple violence?
o Common Couple Violence (CCV) concerns “normative” isolated violence
o Myth 1: It is obvious
• Maxims
 a. Violence on a continuum
 b. Violence based on culture and individuals
 c. Violence seen differently by people
o Myth 2: Violence is Gendered
• Maxims
 a. Males victimized more (Common Couple Violence only, vs. Paternal Terrorism)
 b. Women engage in similar rates
 c. Women harmed more (but)
 d. Men adopting traditional gender attitudes more likely to harm
o Myth 3: Female Violence Due to Self Defense
• Maxims:
 a. Violence motives are complex
 b. Both men and women defend selves
 c. Disagreement based on observer vs. participant roles
 d. Violence often due to both people
 e. Blaming based on whose account?
o Myth 4: Intimate Violence is Unilateral
• Maxims
 A. Violence is mostly reciprocal
 B. Sex differences in CCV tend to show women perpetrate
o Myth 5: Intimate Violence is Chronic
• Maxim: Most violence is not stable
 9-13% highly stable (once per week)
 20% marriages CCV
 1-2 violent acts in past year
 No violence in next two years
o Myth 6: Male Violence About Power
• Maxims
 All conflict is about power!
 Gender effects n.s.
 Need to control same
 Motives vary (e.g., anger, jealousy, getting attention)
 How is power conveyed by powerful?
 Expressive vs. instrumental violence
o Myth 7: Intimate Violence is Harmful
• Maxims:
 Many relationships involving violence are satisfactory (33% to 67% stayed same or IMPROVED)
 Violence of minor/less damaging forms
 Injuries are minor (e.g., only 28% of women and 22% of men require hospitalization !?!?!?)
o Myth 8: Violence More Harmful than Verbal Aggression
• Maxims
 Comm aggression more harmful to psychological well-being
 Comm aggression leads to physical aggression
 Threats can endure
o Myth 9: Violence is Incompetent
• Maxims
 Minor violence might help rels
 Reciprocation indicates acceptance
 Violence a critical juncture—conflict is out of hand
 Large percentages approve of violence in some form (p. 236, top)
 Violence has own rationality
• What are Spitzberg’s maxims?
• What is his Model?
General Model of Violence
• Violence evolves from conflict
• Transgressions lead to loss of face/identity
• Face threats lead to defense/offense
• Transgressions evoke negative emotions
• Negative emotions escalate severity
• Course depends of people’s competence
• What is Mediation?
o “Mediation is a process involving two or more parties who are in conflict with each other and an “uninvolved” third party (the mediator” (Hale and Thieme, p. 256).
o Mediator not a judge but a facilitator for parties to reach an agreement (not necessarily understanding).
o Principles of Mediation:
• Self-determination
 Un-coerced
 Autonomous
• Informed decisions
 Participation in mediation
 Commitments for (in)action
• Confidentiality
o Goals of Mediation
• 1. To help parties reach agreement
• 2. To help resolve emotional issues
• 3. To help empower participants
• 4. To help tell story
• Stages of Mediation
o Stage 1: Introductions
• Parties might not trust
 Each other
 Mediation Process
 Define mediation and role
• Begin on positive note (e.g., congratulate)
• Set ground rules (next slide)
• Mediator sets expectations
 Mediator establishes rules
• Parties speak one at a time
• No interruption
• Listen to each other
• No foul language
 Mediator assures parties of confidentiality, though judges or others connected to the conflict will have right to know.
o Stage 2: Telling the Story
• Each side tells their story
• Who requested mediation begins
• Assure that both sides will be heard.
o Stage 3: Identifying the Issues
• Stories help mediator to identify issues
 Mediator must understand issues
 Mediator must listen and take notes
 Mediator asks when s/he does NOT understand a point of contention
 Mediators are not experts at discussion topics
 Mediators ask parties about interests
 Mediators focus on underlying issues
 Mediators obtain mutual problem description.
o Stage 4: Generating Options
• Parties generate options for themselves
• Mediator can help generate options
• Unfair options present a dilemma
• Mediator must insist on fairness
• Mediator must be neutral
o Stage 5: Writing the Agreement
• Agreement must be precise
• Agreement written in a positive manner-what the parties will do
• If parties agree to agreement, they sign
• Alternative to agreement might be litigation, about which the mediator can remind parties