• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/31

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

31 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
C.L Lewis Moral argument
All persons have a moral law. Universal moral law implies a law giver.
moral argument
1. All have a moral sense (conscience)
2. implies a single law giver
3. A law giver (God) exist
Anselm
1. archbishop of Canterbury In 1066
2. abbot of a monestary
Anselm argues so that.....
he may understand
sin and ignorance
Make you far from God
ignorance
Is overcome by faith
God is
That than which nothing greater can be thought
Anselm argues
1. God is that than which nothing greater can be thought
2. To exist in reality and understanding is greater than to exist in the understanding alone
Two ways of existence
1. In understanding alone
2. In reality and understanding
gaunilo on anselm
says that this theory could apply to anything. Ex. Lost island
Anselm response to guanilo
Nothing could be more real than God so anselms theory can't be applied to the physical
a greater than God can be conceived
If he exist in the mind alone
fool
reaches a contradiction because even he can agree that God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived. but admit this to admit that a God must exist in reality, because if he didn't exist he wouldn't fit the definition.
modal version
1. Necessary being exist in all possible world's
2. possible beings exist in some possible world's
3. God is possible being
4. 2&3=God exist in some possible world
5. 1&4= God exist in all possible world's
6. This world is a possible world
7. God exist in this actual world
teleological argument
endirected behavior is a telos= purpose
cosmological arguements
reason for universe or comos
effect is experience that a thing exist
cause necessary that God exist
inductive
future will be like the past (particular)
deductive
generally universal, cause and effect
abductive
from particular to universal
anselm apriori
logical and rational (begins with definition)
aquínas (aposteriori)
experience based
cosmological arguement issues
a real effect, the effect then has a real cause, there must then be a real creator
kant
You must know what a creator is before you can think of cosmological proof
proof for God's existence
is only offered from someone who already believes he exist
aquínas 1st way
If things are in motion, there must have been a first unmoved mover to begin there movement
aquínas 2nd way
efficient causality is present therefore, there must be a first efficient cause
aquínas 3rd way
possible beings are present, therefore there must be a first necessary being
aquínas 4th way
gradation in being true, good, and Noble in the light leads to a first perfect being
aquínas 5th way
governance of the world. There is endirected behavior therefore there must be an intelligent director
Aristotle 4 causes
1. material
2. formal
3. efficient
4. final cause