• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/3

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

3 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

Collectivisation of agriculture



Aim: fund industrialisation


Create productive farms


Why collectivise?



1)replace capitalist NEP- campaign against right


2) industrialised society more likely to conform to Marxism


3) moved workers to towns to industrialise- (new machines)


4) exploit land and peasants


5) more industry for defence


6)poor harvests 1927-9 then grain procurement crisis 1927-9 (peasants kept grain) forcible procurement produced required grain amount for state



Rich peasants (kulaks) scapegoat and accused of hoarding grain




Ideology- Marxism


Against right- stop NEP


Necessary for industrialisation for defence and releasing workers into towns


Grain procurement crisis


Kulaks

Process of collectivisation:



1) by feb 1930 50% peasant house holds collectivised


2) basic food rationed


3) article 107- hoarding illegal


4) dekulakisation 1929- secret police: arrests, land confiscated


5) 25 thousanders 'supervise collectivisation'.. 'Anti-kulak'


Social impact:


1) 30k arson attacks 1st year


2) over 1/4 livestock destroyed by feb 1929 (resistance)


3) hoard/ destroy grain


S's article 'party officials too keen'


To prevent S loss of control


4) rural areas food shortage


5) party activists crushed peasant resistance 'requisitioning gangs'


6) 1932-4 famine (7mil deaths)


7) 10 mil exiled- prison camp/ slave labour


10 million exiled


Requisitioning gangs


Famine 1932-4


25% livestock killed feb 1929


Arson and organised protests


Rationing basic food


Dekulakisation


Economic impacts:



1) between 1928-35 grain procured doubled


2) migration to towns- labour


3) agriculture never tsarist data


4) livestock 1935 half 1928


5) little expertise in countryside ➡️ dekulakisation and party officials not agriculture experts


6) peasants no incentive 2 work- not bought themselves


7) terror and quotas- grain low in rural area but towns fed

Political impacts:



1) S control of countryside ⬆️


2) 1941 98% land collectivised


3) destroyed peasants as political force- ⬇️ opposition


4) secret police central to state- agents across country side


5) S 'socialist leader' and towns steady food source



Overall- total amount produced and available for sale SAME


Internal passports for control


Loads die- animals and ppl


Loss of expertise


Food and men for towns

Failures: animals and ppl die


Famine in countryside


Loss of skills- dekulakisation


Funds for industrialisation


Food and workers for towns


S authority in countryside


S socialist leaders


Internal passports- control