Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
165 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Orienting
|
attracting attention to something
|
|
Disengaging
|
shifting attention AWAY from something
|
|
Sustaining
|
holding attention onto something
|
|
Measures of Attention: Heart rate
|
There is a change in heart rate with orienting, and sustaining and waning attention
HR slow more during longer looking Focused looking, HF below baseline |
|
Other measures of attention
|
Motor activity: may be a link between motor system and visual system: More movement, less attention--more attention, less movement
|
|
Orienting response present from birth with what
|
orienting reflex
|
|
After orienting, attention
|
is either sustained or terminated
|
|
If stimulus repeated
|
attentin wanes
|
|
If new stimulus
|
attention is sustained
|
|
Stimulus properties that orient and sustain may be
|
different
|
|
Disengaging attention-what happens
|
Habituation, decrease in looking time and in HR, second slowing of HR allows better disengaging--this is difficult for young infants/toddlers before second slowing
|
|
What type of development guides development of attention
|
cortical (especially frontal cortex) development
|
|
Early infancy (0-2 months)
|
object properties key, movement, sound and light, combination
|
|
Older infants (3months-18months)
|
object properties still important, more purposeful attention, initiate engagement, animate (people), novel objects
anticipate where object will appear, predict patterns, more control of attention |
|
Toddlers
|
sustained attention longer--but still only a few minutes
|
|
Inhibition
|
ability to filter out irrelevant information-increases with age
|
|
1st-6th grade
|
attention to relevant stimuli develops faster
|
|
ADHD %
|
3-5% of school aged children
|
|
Characteristics of ADHD
|
inability to sustain attention, careless, forgetful, disorganized, hyperactivity, restless (NOT all children display this), impulsivity, difficulty waiting turn, blurting out answers
|
|
ADHD decreased blood flow
|
in the frontal cortex
|
|
Pro Saccades Inhibition test
|
look toward stimulus on screen (controls reach ceiling around age 10, no diff with ADHD)
|
|
Anti saccade
|
look away toward a blank field (controls slower reaction time, reach ceiling in 20s, ADHD longer RT, more errors)
|
|
Inhibition difficult
|
with ADHD--but changing task demands can reduce errors significantly (add a cue)
|
|
Representation
|
what is in the mind-a symbol, image, concept that is held in the mind, remembered and can be manipulated
|
|
reproductive images
|
static (unchanging) rep of objects that have been experienced BEFORE
|
|
anticipatory images
|
transformations of an image, even if it is a transformation that has never been experienced before
|
|
Preoperational children only have what images
|
reproductive
|
|
anticipatory images not availble until
|
concrete operational stage
|
|
Imitation of an invisible gesture (piaget)(12 months)
|
you can imitate an expression you've never seen before in order to compare your face to the one you are imitating
|
|
Meltzoff and Moore Dark room study
|
2-3 week old infant in dark room, experimenter with light on face, produce action 4 times in 20 seconds, rest 20, then another 4times/20 sec
|
|
Is meltzoff and moore study imitation
|
infants showed evidence for producing the action, -tongue protrusion more replicated, but might not be imitation, other non human stimuli elicit same response--might be ADAPTIVE REFLEX
|
|
mickey mouse study
|
2 Mickey Mouse dolls are shown, screen goes up, hand shown putting another one in, screen goes away, still 2 shown: infants looked longer when total was wrong, even though it is more familiar
|
|
Mickey mouse study shows that infants may have
|
a natural realization of small numbers (1, 2, 3) SUBITIZING
|
|
Adults register numbers
|
faster than would be expected by counting
|
|
animals (pigeons)
|
can also recognize and diferentiate between small numbers
|
|
In opposition to piaget, infants may have
|
the beginnings of representation, but it is just not the same as adults
|
|
representational insight
|
understanding that a symbol can stand for something else (first step in using symbols successfully)
|
|
dual representation
|
being able to see the symbol as a thing itself and a represntation at the same time (young children have trouble keeping two things in mind)
|
|
Snoopy Scale model task
|
2.5 year olds couldn't use model as symbol, couldn't find it in the big room, but could go back to model and find. 3 year olds sucessful
|
|
how can make snoopy easier
|
making the symbol itself less interesting and salient helps children use it as a representation (picture, video)
|
|
If demands of dual representation of task are removed
|
2.5 year olds can do the scale model task
|
|
Shrinking room experiment
|
same as before, but tell children that the model is actually a shrunken version of the same room. 2.5 year olds can do it now--think about it in a different way
|
|
Appearance reality distinction
|
cat w/ dog mask: 3 year olds think it really is a dog now
5 year olds know it is still a cat |
|
Phenomonism error
|
if it looks red, believe that it is really red (milk in red glass)
|
|
intellectual realism error
|
looks like a sponge, believe it is a sponge (painted)
|
|
Real vs. imagined events
|
gradual development of telling the difference between something that is real or imagined, 4 year olds know at time, but might remember it differently later (remembering events from childhood, or remember being told about them)
|
|
Unless deception is involved
|
even with simple tasks and training, 3 year olds don't get it
|
|
dual encoding
|
thinking about the reality and appearance at the same time (develops gradually)
|
|
theory of mind
|
the knowledge that other people have their own thoughts, beliefs and desires (different than your own)and that these thoughts, beliefs and desires will guid their behaviors. this allows us to predict other's actions
|
|
belief desire reasoning
|
the use of desires and beliefs to explain and predict peoples actions. could be the basis for an adult theory of mind. adults use so much taht we even talk of objects having beliefs and desires (computers, cars)
|
|
False belief tasks
|
test whether children understand that others may have different knowlege and beliefs about a situation than they do and that another person may have a belief that is false (not consistent with what the child knows to be true)
|
|
Maxi task
|
candy hidden, maxi leaves room, candy is moved, where will maxi look for candy (4 year olds do ok, 3 year olds think maxi knows what they know)
|
|
smarties task
|
experimenter shows the child a familiar candy box, child asked what they think is in the box, experimenter shows the child that pencils are in the box, ask child what they thought was in the box, they say pencils, also say other children will think pencils
|
|
representational change
|
the child's memory for their initial belief, 3 years olds answer that they used to htink the same thing they think now
|
|
Difficulty with
|
2 representations of a single object (candy at 2 locations or two different contents of the box)
|
|
Could be children can't do smarties because
|
unable to inhibit the salient informatino of the actual locatin of the candy or the contents of the box
|
|
children with older siblings and more adults often do
|
better on false beliefs tasks
|
|
language abilities correlated with
|
performance on false belief tasks--children who use sentences like " i believe that, he thinks that"
|
|
importance of task
|
children may show theory of mind at different ages depending on the task that is used
|
|
Visual Preference Paradigm
|
2 stimuli shown simultaneously, longer looking at one indicateds discrimination and preference (something attracts them)
|
|
Habituation paradigm
|
stimuli shown sequently, looking time decreases, new stimulus presented, looking time measured, increasing in looking time indicated discrimination
|
|
Visual perception at one week
|
visual acuity: 20/600, movement: large slow objects, convergence and coordination
minute old: prefer faces, 12 hrs prefer mother, following moving faces, no preference for A and B contrast, but prefer ab over cd |
|
Convergence
|
both eyes can focus on same thing
|
|
coordination
|
move eyes with moving object
|
|
1-2 months visual perception
|
visual acuity 20/300, no discrimination in high constrast face at 6 weeks, subcortical reflexes decline, tracking faces declines,
|
|
3-4 months visual perception
|
motion helps identify objects--special attraction to human motion
symmetry, efficient processing of vertical symmetry faces: infants prefer attractive faces, prefer correct contrast, infants understand that vision with one eye is different than vision with two eyes |
|
stereopsis
|
binocular depth
|
|
5-6 visual perception
|
infants do not dishabituate to an averaged face
|
|
7-8 months perception
|
monocular depth cues without motion
relative size, texture, interposition, preference for vertical symmetry |
|
relative size
|
if the object is bigger, it must be closer
|
|
texture
|
more distinguishable of texture of closer objects
|
|
interpostion
|
an object is closer if you can see all of object
|
|
9 months visual perception
|
have a lot of adult like visual abilities, good visual acuity, binoc an monoc depth perception
|
|
high sucking rate
|
stimulus present
|
|
preferential sucking
|
infants suck faster or slower to hear stimulus
|
|
one week auditory
|
sensitive to higher frequencies, prefer women's voices, mother's language, pref sucking to hear mothers voice, and familiar passage
|
|
2-4 months auditory
|
infants can turn their head when they hear phoneme change, prefer own name
|
|
6-12 months auditory
|
infants can discriminate btwen phoneme contrasts NOT in their language (english/hindi, japanese/english)all infants can distinguish at 6 months but NOT 9-12 months
|
|
intermodal integration
|
newborns can orient to new sound
|
|
propprioceptive info
|
info gleaned thru body motions or balance (posture) posture is always changing
|
|
intermodal matching
|
must match 2 stimuli, each one presented to a different sense, at 4 months can coordinate visual input with sound, see 2 movies with different actions, watch the movie that fits with sound
|
|
perception and action
|
perception guides action--they are integrated
|
|
optical flow
|
movements in the viusal field that indicate bodily or object movement
|
|
waterbed study
|
2 surfaces: platform, waterbed, if only one surface presented, all infants cross hard surface, walkers spent more time exploring waterbed, all crawled across.
if both surfaces presented, crawlers showed no preference, walkeres, almost all preferred hard surface |
|
role of vision in detecting crossable surfaces
|
2 firm surfaces, 2 diff covers, one velvet black
our surace presented, all infants crossed, but walkers explored, 2 surfaces presented, all infants preferred checkered carpet |
|
actions guide perception
|
infants make more exploratory movements when they need perceptual infor to move (walkers more wary than crawlers, more exploratory, need to learn posture and bdy movements all over again when walking--not same as crawling)
|
|
Crawling linked to
|
perceptual skills, not age
|
|
visual cliff
|
chick avoid right after birth, kittens only avoid after walking is good, 2 and 3 month old infants can detect the change in depth (heart rate decelerates) 9 month olds who crawl fear cliff, heart rate accelerates
|
|
capacity and speed of processing
|
capacity of UM depends partly on speed of processing
linear rel btwn speech rate and number of words recalled |
|
speed and capacity affected by
|
expertise and ease of identification
|
|
neo piagetian info processing theories
|
attempt to explain how children progress thru stages
|
|
m-space
|
child's current capacity in working memory M=a+k
progression thru stages is incrases in m space more space, more info simultaineously |
|
changes in k
|
changes in the ability to understand task demands and consider more items
|
|
operating space
|
work with info, apply strategies, efficiency
|
|
storage space
|
space where you store info ryou are currently working with
|
|
total processing space
|
operating plus storage
|
|
operating space gets smaller
|
storage space gets larger, but total op space does not change
|
|
why changes in operating space
|
age, tasks (harder, more space required, less storage allowed)
|
|
how does operating space change
|
automatization, biological maturation
|
|
executive processes-reaction time task
|
attention interferes with working memory
|
|
executive processes
|
attention, inhibition
|
|
what are info processing approaches
|
framework for understnading how people (receive, use, store, retrieve information)
|
|
what develops in info processing
|
processing capacity and processing speed
|
|
declarative memory
|
episodic: memory for events
semantic: memory for facts, rules, etc. procedural memory: knowing how to do things |
|
automization
|
automatic processes: ie statistical learning
effortful processes: glucose consumption |
|
short term store/memory
|
number of things that can be kept in mind at once
|
|
working memory
|
number of items you ca work with in your head at once
|
|
span of apprehension
|
sensory store
|
|
amount of sensory information available in short term store
|
2 years: 2
5 years: 4 7 years: 5 9 years: 6 Adults: 7 working memory is two digits less |
|
verbal articulation is responsible for what
|
working memory span, longer words, faster talking
|
|
speed of processing in wm usually measured
|
measured in reaction time, identification, name retrieval, addtion (time required varies between tasks)
|
|
other effects on processing speed
|
expertise, item identification (ease of it)
5 year olds identify faces slower than adults, results in few remembered |
|
connectionist modeling
|
simulate on computer how thinking works
mimic neuronal connections and behavior--demonstrate how neurons can represent knowledge and learning |
|
input nodes
|
initial representation of information
|
|
hidden layers
|
combine infor from input
|
|
out put nodes
|
response (supervised learning)
|
|
german case model
|
tool to learn how brain works--pattern detector, knowledge represented by patterns
|
|
wisconsin card sorting task
|
measures inhibition, frontal lobe regulated
|
|
testing infant perception using a habituation paradigm indicates
|
discriminatino between stimuli
|
|
at birth, infants can trun their heads toward a sound they hear
|
intermodal integration
|
|
when given a choice between a water bed surface or a hard surface, infants who walk choose
|
hard surface
|
|
who doesn't show fear of visual cliff
|
3 month old infant
|
|
knowing how to drive a car is an example of what memory
|
procedural memory
|
|
sensory store does what
|
filters out information from environmental input for manipulation in short term memory
|
|
as children get older, they can recall a greater number of items--reflects change in what
|
working memory capacity
|
|
glucose consumption
|
more difficult taks require mroe glucose
|
|
characteristics of attention in early infancy
|
regulated by autonomic nervous system, sustained by properties of the object, orient by pairing a visual stimulus with a sound
|
|
stimulants are given to children with ADHD because
|
increases blood flow in the frontal cortex which allows better regulation of attention
|
|
in a classification task, labeling an item, and describing an inherent characteristic of that item llows children to
|
attribute the characteristic to a different looking item that belongs in the same conceptual category
|
|
according to class lecture, using habituation and preferential looking paradigms has shown that 3 and 4 months infants are able to form categories based on
|
perceptual characteristics of items
|
|
which task can be passed at the youngest age
|
scale model task
|
|
ability to treat a set of things as somehow equivalent, or call them by the same ame is called
|
categorization
|
|
recognition memory
|
memory without awareness, non declarative
|
|
short familiartization time
|
infants prefer the familiar stimulus
|
|
long familiarization time
|
infants prefer the novel stimulus
|
|
why difference in familiarization time
|
in coding, shorter time doesn't llow infants to encode feature or they aren't able to store them in short term memory
|
|
size shape color test
|
immediate recall, size color shape
15 min delay: shape color 24 min delay: only shape |
|
fragmented picture task
|
see line drawing of objects and nme it, later see fragmented pic of same and new object. name old picture faster because they saw the full picture--no developmental effects in implicit memory
|
|
mobile and ribbon
|
tie ribbon to mobile, infants learn to kcik to make it move
2months retain for 48 hours, 6 months retain for 2 weeks if given reminder, but not allowed to kick, they remember longer HIGHLY CONTEXT SPECIFIC--changes in ribbon or mobile will result in changes in memory performance |
|
patterns and shape changes
|
disrupt memory more than color changes
|
|
implicit memories in adults
|
are not context specific
|
|
gong test
|
shown how to make gone, after delay, given toys and observed
9 months recall after 1 month 10 months recall after 3 months 20 months recall after 12 months |
|
factors affecting explicit memories in infancy
|
temporal order (older infants able to remember sequence)
casual relations ( when order is important, helps memory) immediate imitation |
|
recall strategies
|
deliberately used to aid encoding and recall (organizing, rehearsal and elaboration)
|
|
organizing
|
chunking information together in groups
|
|
rehearsal
|
repateing information to be remembered
|
|
elaboration
|
create a meaningful relationship between items that is not inherently present
|
|
mediatinoal deficiencies
|
do not use spotaneously, do not benefit from it
|
|
production deficiencies
|
benefit, but do not use spontaneously, shown and encouraged, but won't use on own
|
|
utilization deficiency
|
stretegy used spontaneously, but children' do not benefit that much (ability to use may not be that great)
|
|
applying strategies across taks
|
children may apply a strategy succesfully on one task and show a production deficiency on another task
|
|
applying strategies WITHIN a task
|
children usually show mediatinoal deficiences first, then production, and then utilization before applying a strategy successfully
|
|
more knowledge about a domain knowledege base
|
leads to better memory for new information
|
|
scripts
|
knowledge structures that describe how events usually happen
2 and 3 years represent events in scripts, inhibits some rentention of novel scripts, parents guide development of scripts |
|
content knowledge
|
semantic knowledge about things--increases processing eficiency
|
|
how does knowledge base aid memory
|
accessibility of specific items-rich representations
activation of relation between items-more organizaed use of deilberate strategies--apply specific strategies easier in familiar domains |
|
Episodic memory
|
memory for events--constructed from gist traces
|
|
gist traces
|
often based on scripts--encodes central aspects of n event
|
|
verbatim traces
|
details exactly as they ocured-last a few weeks
|
|
Children's testimony
general question |
what happened at school?
2-3 years recall little, but accurate 4 years, recall more detilas froma scripted story than non scripted story |
|
children's testimony, specific questions
|
what did the bike look like?
incrases in incorrect info from kindergarten and 2nd graders, older children and adults gave more correct infor |
|
do children retain incorrect information?
|
short delay, often do not retain the incorrect information
long delay: incorrect info IS RECALLED, why? accurate info is based on berbatime traces which fade faster-inaccurate info is based on gist traces |
|
suggestive questions
|
preschool children especially susceptible--more likely to be swayed
3 and 6 year olds: peripheral info: more likely to be swayed central info: less liekly to be swayed |
|
with suggestive questions, is there a change in representation or just their answers
|
stronger suggestions, more changed in representation
peripheral info: minrepresentation in later recall central info: less liekly to be misrepresented in later recall |
|
young children's memories are an interplay of many differenet factors such as
|
age, type of questions, length of delay after event, knowledge base, use of strategies
|