• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/15

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

15 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Erie Doctrine - Usually

Apply substantive state law and federal procure.
Swift v. Tyson
Check Fraud. RDA only means statutes. not common law.
Rules Decision Act (RDA)
State law applies except for Constitution and acts of congress.
Erie RR v. Tompkins
Train door injury. RDA applies to state common law as well. Rejects Swift.
Guaranty Trust v. York
(RDA) Outcome determinative test.
Outcome-determinative test
(RDA)Where outcomes differ. apply state law.
Ragan v. Merchants Transfer
(RDA) Kansas SoL. When is the action commenced?
Byrd v. Blue Ridge
(RDA) Outcome is not the only thing. Countervailing federal interest.
Countervailing Federal Interest
Can overcome state law in RDA cases.
Hanna v. Plumer
Served the wife. (REA) Contradicting FRCP overrides state law.
Rules Enabling Act (REA)
Empowers SCOTUS to make procedural rules. FRCP.
Hanna I
(REA) FRCP must be on point. If not then state law applies.
Hanna II
(RDA) Apply twin aims of Erie. Forum Shopping. Inequitable administration of law.
Walker v. Armco
(REA) SoL. FRCP 3 is not on point.

Gasperini v. Shady Grove

Lost Slides with high damages. Applied state statute "deviates materially" with Fed standard of review "abuse of discretion".