Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
8 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
BODY LANGUAGE |
THE SPECIFIC PHYSIOLOGICAL REACTIONS THAT OCCUR WHEN SOMEONE MAY BE UNDER STRESS AND USEFUL IN DETECTING DECEPTION. |
|
|
CUSTODY |
THIS OCCURS WHEN A PERSON IS DEPRIVED OF HIS/HER FREEDOM IN ANY SIGNIFICANT WAY OR IS NOT FREE TO LEAVE THE PRESENCE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT. |
|
|
DELAY IN ARRAIGNMENT RULE |
IN THE CASE OF MCNABB VS. THE US, THE US SUPREME COURT RULED THE FAILURE OF FEDERAL OFFICERS TO TAKE A PRISONER BEFORE A COMMITTING OFFICER WITHOUT NECESSARY DELAY AUTOMATICALLY RENDERS HIS CONFESSION INADMISSIBLE. |
|
|
ELECTRONIC RECORDINGS |
THIS IS AN AUDIO, VIDEO OR COMBO OF BOTH THAT MAY BE USED TO RECORD THE INTERROGATION PROCESS. |
|
|
FREE AND VOLUNTARY RULE |
THE SUPREME COURT RULED IN BROWN VS. MISSISSIPPI IN 1936 THAT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES COULD A CONFESSION BE CONSIDERED FREE AND VOLUNTARILY GIVEN WHEN IT WAS OBTAINED AS A RESULT OF PHYSICAL BRUTALITY AND VIOLENCE INFLICTED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS ON THE ACCUSED. |
|
|
INTERROGATION |
FOR LEGAL PURPOSES, THE US SUPREME COURT HAS RULED THAT INTERROGATIONS WILL INCLUDE ANY EXPRESSED QUESTIONING OR ANY VERBAL OR NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS THAT IS DESIGNED TO ELICIT AN INCRIMINATING STATEMENT OR RESPONSE FROM THE SUSPECT OF A CRIME. |
|
|
INTERVIEW |
A PROCESS THAT IS PRIMARILY NONACCUSTORY AND INTENDED TO GET INFORMATION. |
|
|
MIRANDA VS. ARIZONA |
THE CASE IN WHICH THE US SUPREME COURT SPELLED OUT GUIDELINES TO BE FOLLWED BY POLIC BEFORE THEY INTERROGATE PERSONS IN CUSTODY AND ATTEMPT TO USE THEIR STATEMENTS AS EVIDENCE. |
