• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/13

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

13 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
affirmative defense
defense to a criminal charge in which defendant admits doing the criminal act, but claims an affirmative defense such as duress or entrapment
Two things needed to prove guilt of a person charged
1. corpus delicti - a crime was committed
2. committed/was party to crime
Immunity
Exemption from criminal prosecution based on U.S Constitution, statues, or international agreements
transactional immunity
total/fully immunity for the criminal offense to which compelled testimony relates
use immunity
prohibits prosecution based off testimony, but does not make witness totally immune from prosecution based on evidence other than the witness’s testimony
When can defense of mistake NOT be used?
In regards to strict liability crimes
What is diplomatic immunity limited to?
Recognized diplomats & certain members of family
Who does legislative immunity apply to?
Active legislators, & only during the time the legislature is in session
Why give someone witness immunity?
To overcome the 5th Amendment privilege a witness has
Mistake of fact
provides defense when the mistake is honest & reasonable & nullifies specific intent needed for conviction of crime charged
2 purposes of double jeopardy
to limit the government’s power to use its resources to subject a citizen to repeated exposure to criminal laws, & guards against conviction of innocent
Res judicata
doctrine stating once an issue has been determined between two parties, it cannot be re litigated by those parties
Collateral estoppel
doctrine stating a fact necessarily found in one trial of a defendant bars proof of the same fact in the second trial