Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
41 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Groups |
People who think of themselves as belonging together and who interact with one another; are the essence of life in society. |
|
Aggregated Groups |
Consists temporarily share the same physical space but who do not see themselves belonging together. Example: Shoppers at Line waiting. |
|
Category |
Statistic; It consits of people who share similar characteristics, such as all college women wear glasses, or men over 6 feet all. An outstanding trait. |
|
Primary Groups |
Intimate, Face to face interactions, they give us identity, a feeling of who we are. |
|
Secondary Groups |
Larger, more anonymous and more formal and impersonal. Shared interests, activities. Example: College class, Sport, Work. Often fails to satisfy intimate associated, often broken down to primary groups. |
|
Voluntary Association |
Groups made up of volunteers Example: Boys and Girls Scouts, Chamer of Commerce, In-Town: Roman Catholic,
|
|
Inner Circle |
Small groups maintain control over the entire organization. |
|
Oligarchy |
Many are rules by few |
|
The Iron Law of Oligarchy |
Refer to how organizations come to be dominated by a small, self perpetuating elite |
|
In Groups |
Groups towards we feel loyal |
|
Out Groups |
Groups towards which we feel antagonism-- Active hostility or oppisition. Example: Nazi: Jews where out groups. |
|
Antagonism |
Active hostility or opposition. |
|
Reference Groups |
The groups we refer to when we evaluate ourselfs. May include Family, teachers, Neigbors |
|
Social Network |
People who are linked to one another. Example: Family, friends, etc |
|
Clique |
Clustrs within a group, or internal factions |
|
6 Degrees of seperation |
Expresses on average, everyone in the USA is seperated by just 6 individuals |
|
Bureaucracies |
A type of organization that was just emerging and that has since become dominate in social life: Example:; Russian army, US Post Office |
|
Characteristics of Bureauracies |
1.) Clear Levels 2.) Division of Labor 3.) Writting Rules 4.) Written Communication and Records 5.) Impersonality and Replaceability |
|
Rationalization of Society |
Meaning that Bureaucracies, with their rules and emphasis on results, would increasingly dominate over lives |
|
Goal Displacement |
Even after the goal is acheived, it is displaced with another goal and continues. |
|
Dysfunctions of Bureauracies |
Alienation Red Tape Peter Principle |
|
Alienation |
Wowkers being cut off from the finishing product of their labor. Many workers begin to feel more like objectives than people |
|
Red Tape |
A rule is a rule
|
|
Peter Principle |
Each employee of Bureauracies is promoted to his/her level of incompetence-- inability to do something successfully; ineptitude |
|
Self Fulfilling Stereotypes and Promotions |
Companies/Corps. will give more advantages and challenges to people who share some characteristics of boss and put them on a fast track position |
|
Corporate Culture |
These stereotypes and their powerful effects on workers remain hidden to everyone, even the bosses |
|
Group Dynamics |
How groups influence us and we influce Groups |
|
Small Groups |
Small enough that all members can interact with one another |
|
Dyad |
Smallest possible group; two people |
|
Triad |
A group of 3 people |
|
Coalitions |
Two group members aligning themselves against one. |
|
Leaders |
People who influence the behaviors, opinions, or attitudes of others.
|
|
Instrumental Leader |
Trys to keep the group moving foward to its goals |
|
Expressive Leader |
Usually is not recongized as a leader. These leaders crack jokes, show sympathy to help a groups morals. |
|
Leadership Styles |
Ways of expressing yourself as a leader |
|
Authoritarian Leader |
One who gives orders. |
|
Democratic Leader |
One who trys to gian consensus-- General Agreement. |
|
Laissez-Faire Leader |
One who is highly permissive; Freedom of behavior |
|
GroupThink |
Collective tunnel vision that group members somtimes develope. |
|
Stanley Theory |
The Small World Phenomenon |
|
Diffusion of Responsability |
As groups grow larger, they tend to break into smaller groups, people are less willing to take responsability |