Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
27 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
heuristic
|
– Probabilistic shortcuts that are rapid, but may lead to false conclusions
|
|
bias
|
– Systematic errors in thinking
|
|
representative heuristic
|
• Evaluating probability of an event based on its superficial similarity with a prototype
• The usual situation when this applies is judging the probability of an event under uncertainty. |
|
base rate
|
• Refers to frequency of a trait or behavior in the general population
|
|
availability heuristic
|
• Estimate probability of an event based on how easily it is retrieved from memory
• Ex: what’s deadlier horses or sharks? • Ex: Do more people die from terrorism or cancer? |
|
cognitive biases
|
• Systematic errors in reasoning and judgment
|
|
hindsight bias
|
• Overestimation of our ability to predict events after they already occurred
– “I knew it all along” claim – Ex: Study of Supreme Court confirmation |
|
overconfidence bias
|
• Overestimation of our ability to predict events after they already occurred
– “I knew it all along” claim – Ex: Study of Supreme Court confirmation |
|
quantification
|
– Increases precision and objectivity of observations by representing them as numbers
|
|
random selection
|
– Helps to draw a representative sample
– Ex: picking patients off a list using a random number generator |
|
external validity
|
– Ability to generalize findings to real world scenarios
– Ex: Introducing misinformation after an event leads to false memories |
|
internal validity
|
– Ability to generalize findings to real world scenarios
– Ex: Introducing misinformation after an event leads to false memories |
|
naturalistic observation
|
• Watching people’s behavior in real-world settings without manipulating it
• High in external validity • Low internal validity |
|
advantages of surveys
|
– Easy to administer
– Provide unique access to personal information |
|
disadvantages of survey s
|
– Assume competent and honest responders
– Malingering |
|
correlation and causation
|
• Correlation does not allow to infer causation
• It is necessary, but insufficient condition |
|
illusory correlation
|
• Perception of a nonexistent association
• Concentrating on situations when two apparently related events occur • Ignoring nonevents |
|
placebo experiment
|
change due to expectation of improvement
|
|
nocebo effect
|
change due to expectation of harm
|
|
experimental expectancy
|
– Unintentionally biasing results
|
|
demand characteristics
|
– Use cues to guess experimenter’s hypothesis
|
|
descriptive statistics
|
– Provides summary of numerical data
|
|
inferential statistics
|
– Allows to draw generalizable conclusions from data
|
|
statistical significance
|
using a probabilistic decision rule to choose between hypotheses
– Probability of the statistical result is > or < than, say, .05 |
|
practical significance
|
– Given a statistical difference what are the practical consequences of finding the effect
|
|
tuskegee study example
|
• From 1932 to 1972 US PHS sponsored the study of syphilis progression
• 399 African-American males from poor, rural areas of Alabama • Did not inform about: – Participation, diagnosis, available treatment • 28 dead from syphilis, 100 from complications, 40 wives infected, passed on to 19 children |
|
ethical issues in research
|
• From 1932 to 1972 US PHS sponsored the study of syphilis progression
• 399 African-American males from poor, rural areas of Alabama • Did not inform about: – Participation, diagnosis, available treatment • 28 dead from syphilis, 100 from complications, 40 wives infected, passed on to 19 children |