• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/27

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

27 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
heuristic
– Probabilistic shortcuts that are rapid, but may lead to false conclusions
bias
– Systematic errors in thinking
representative heuristic
• Evaluating probability of an event based on its superficial similarity with a prototype
• The usual situation when this applies is judging the probability of an event under uncertainty.
base rate
• Refers to frequency of a trait or behavior in the general population
availability heuristic
• Estimate probability of an event based on how easily it is retrieved from memory
• Ex: what’s deadlier horses or sharks?
• Ex: Do more people die from terrorism or cancer?
cognitive biases
• Systematic errors in reasoning and judgment
hindsight bias
• Overestimation of our ability to predict events after they already occurred
– “I knew it all along” claim
– Ex: Study of Supreme Court confirmation
overconfidence bias
• Overestimation of our ability to predict events after they already occurred
– “I knew it all along” claim
– Ex: Study of Supreme Court confirmation
quantification
– Increases precision and objectivity of observations by representing them as numbers
random selection
– Helps to draw a representative sample
– Ex: picking patients off a list using a random number generator
external validity
– Ability to generalize findings to real world scenarios
– Ex: Introducing misinformation after an event leads to false memories
internal validity
– Ability to generalize findings to real world scenarios
– Ex: Introducing misinformation after an event leads to false memories
naturalistic observation
• Watching people’s behavior in real-world settings without manipulating it
• High in external validity
• Low internal validity
advantages of surveys
– Easy to administer
– Provide unique access to personal information
disadvantages of survey s
– Assume competent and honest responders
– Malingering
correlation and causation
• Correlation does not allow to infer causation
• It is necessary, but insufficient condition
illusory correlation
• Perception of a nonexistent association
• Concentrating on situations when two apparently related events occur
• Ignoring nonevents
placebo experiment
change due to expectation of improvement
nocebo effect
change due to expectation of harm
experimental expectancy
– Unintentionally biasing results
demand characteristics
– Use cues to guess experimenter’s hypothesis
descriptive statistics
– Provides summary of numerical data
inferential statistics
– Allows to draw generalizable conclusions from data
statistical significance
using a probabilistic decision rule to choose between hypotheses
– Probability of the statistical result is > or < than, say, .05
practical significance
– Given a statistical difference what are the practical consequences of finding the effect
tuskegee study example
• From 1932 to 1972 US PHS sponsored the study of syphilis progression
• 399 African-American males from poor, rural areas of Alabama
• Did not inform about:
– Participation, diagnosis, available treatment
• 28 dead from syphilis, 100 from complications, 40 wives infected, passed on to 19 children
ethical issues in research
• From 1932 to 1972 US PHS sponsored the study of syphilis progression
• 399 African-American males from poor, rural areas of Alabama
• Did not inform about:
– Participation, diagnosis, available treatment
• 28 dead from syphilis, 100 from complications, 40 wives infected, passed on to 19 children