• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/43

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

43 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Personal Attributions

Suggest a person's behaviour is caused by his/her characteristics

Situational Attributions

Suggest the situation explains behaviour

Consistency

** Are people's explanations consistent over time?

Distinctiveness

** Is distinctiveness high or low?

Consensus

**Is there consensus (others agree or disagree)

Fundamental Attribution Error

We underestimate the impact of the situation and overestimate the role of personal factors

Self-Serving Bias

Encourage ourselves for our success, but blame others for our failures

Primary Effect

We attach more importance to initial information about somone

Recency Effect

(More credit to new information) - if we are encouraged not to make snap judgements (or until new evidence overwhelms us)

Mental Set

Readiness to see something in a particular way (the sloppy roommate)



Schemas

Mental frameworks which help us interpret information (e.g., someone tells you she's a comedian)

Stereotype

Generalized belief about a group, a powerful schema (ex. brown people are dumb)

Self-Fulfilling Prophecies

Occur (typically without awareness) when our expectations lead us to treat others in a certain way

Attitude

Is a positive or negative evaluative reaction toward a stimulus (person, action, object, or concept)

Richard LaPierre

Chinese prejudice study, counteracting situational factors, greater awareness & convictions, and general attitudes

Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

We strive for consistency in our cognitions to eliminate the tension caused by the inconsistency

Persuasion

Involves a communicater who delivers a message through a channel (verbally, visually, or in writing) to an audience within a surrounding context

Communication Credibility

How believable is the communicator

Expertise & Trustworthiness

Appears to be an expert, presenting unbiased truth, advocates point of view contrary to self-interest

Physical Attractiveness

Similar interests to our own (advertising)

Two-Sided Refutational Approach

If the perspective has two sides (& audience is aware), the two-sided message approach is less biased

Social Influence

How behaviour is affected by the presence of others

Social Facilitation

An increased tendency to perform one's dominant response in the mere presence of others

Social Norms

Shared expectations about how people should think, feel, and act. They are the glue that binds our social system together

Social Roles

Set of norms that characterise how people in social position are supposed to behave (ex. lawyers, doctors)

Zimbardo

Stanford prison study

Conformity

The adjustment of individual behaviours, attitudes, and beliefs to a group standard (without, we would have chaos)

Informational Social Influence

May follow others because we feel they are competent in what they are doing

Normative Social Influence

Want to obtain rewards of being accepted and avoid rejection

Group Size

As group size increased, conformity increased, but only to a point. More than 4 or 5 didn't change things

Solomon Asch

37% of the time, the participant agrees with the group

Presence of a Dissenter

If one dissenter, then conformity greatly reduced (dissenter serves as a model that disagreement is okay)

Nuremberg Trails

"I was only following orders"

Milgram

*****

Remoteness of Victim

**Obedience when the victim is out of sight (goes up), in sight obedience (goes down 40%)

Closeness & Legitimacy of Authority Figure

**Legitimate authority leaves room & orders by phone, or ordinary person gives (goes down 20%)

Cog in the Wheel

**Someone else does the dirty work, but when personally responsible...

Personal Characteristics

Seem irrelevant (e.g., religious orientation, political, occupation, education)

Deindividuation

A loss of individuality that leads to disinhibited behaviour

Decision Making

Is it often assumed that group decisions are more likely to be well-balanced than decisions of individuals

Group Polarization

"Average" opinion of like-minded people becomes stronger

Self-Censorship

**Without doubts & create

Illusion of Unanimity

**