• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
SOFT POWER (pg431)
the ability to exercise international influence that is increased when a country's values and conduct are respected throught the world:
-these are intangible resources (i.e) culture, ideology, and institutions.
-acheives goals through attraction
HARD POWER (431)
(U.S, Russia)
ability to exercise international influence by tangible resources, i.e military power
-coercing with hard military power
SECURITY DILEMMA (410)
the possibility that a state's actions to provide for its security may result in a decrease in the security of all states, including itself.
-States arm themselves in response to others increased arms, declining all states security.
STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM
(Sudan slaughtering 2.4 million)
formal assistance, training, and arming of foreign terrorists by a state in order to achieve foreign policy goals.
ASYMMETRIC WARFARE
armed conflict between terrorist and conventional warfare
Terrorism (notes)
The deliberate and indiscriminate use of violence. It is not an act, but it is designed to change hearts and minds.
STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM
(notes)
indiscriminate use of violene against civilians; supported by governments or used by governments
COMMON TERRORISM OBJECTIVES
Agitational: promoting the group, advertising agenda, discredit rivals
Coercive: disorienting a target population, inflating perceived power of the group, provoking an overreaction from police & military.
Organizational: acquiring resources, forging group cohesion, maintaining underground supporters.
Diversionary Theory of War
hypotheis that leaders initiate conflict abroad as a way of increasing theri citizens approval of them and naional cohesion at home.
Informational Warfare
attacking telecommunications and computer networks to degrage the technological systems vital to its defense and economic well being. (cyberterrorism)
First Level of Analysis
Human Nature
-Intraspecific (routine killing of their own kind)
-Interspecific (killing of other species)
Second level of Analysis
States Internal Charecteristics
-Cultural determinants, cultural conditioning,
-Pverty and relative deprivation (peoples perception that they are deprived of wealth and status that they deserve in comparison with advantaged others)
-Geopolitical environmental factors
-Demographic stress (population dynamics)
-Militarization
Nationalism:
love of and loyalty to a nation is widely belived to be the cauldron from which wars often spring.
THIRD LEVEL OF ANALYSIS
Cycles of War and Peace
-war springs from changes at the global level of analysis; as a product of the decentralized charecter of the global system that requires soverign states to rely on self-help
"Causes of Armed Conflict"
Dempgraphic Stress
(2cnd level of analysis, states internal charecteristics)
-rate of urban population growth and rate of death among working-age adults are predictors
-Presence of a large population of young males
"Causes of armed conflict"
Militarization
(2cnd levela of analysis, states internal charecteristics)
-militarization has NOT led to peace in the Global South!
-
"Causes of armed conflict"
Economic System
(2cnd level of analysis, states internal charecteristics)
-communist theory of immperialism: capitalism produces surplus capital- the need to export it stimulates wars to capture and protect foreign markets
-marxists believed that the best way to end international war was to end capitalism
-Globalization
-relative gains: rich get riher and poor get poorer
???
Individualistic fallacy?
???
Ecological fallacy
ethe error of assuming that culture or a country makes individuals the same inside of it or of the same attitudes
Demographic Stress
(second level analysis)
-risk of vicil war is greatest in those countries where population dynamics impact heavily on living conditions
Militarization
(Second level of analysis)
Global south countries concentrating budgets on equiping militaries.
Economic System
(Second level of analysis)
-linking trade to armed conflict
b/c of relative gains
Government
(second level of analysis)
whether it is a democracy or emerging as such, this may influence war or peace
Nationalism
(second level of analysis)
love of and loyalty to nation
Super patriots?
THIRD LEVEL OF ANALYSIS
(Cycles of War and Peace in the Global system)
-security dilemma
-violence breeding violence
-power transitions
-Cyclical theories (long cycle theory)
Security Dilema
(3rd analysis: cycles of war and peace)
-threatened by the defensive arming of others, a state may arm in response causing all states security to decline
Bargaining model of war
(3rd analysis: cycles of war and peace)
-an interpretation of wars onset as a choice by the initator to bargain with agression with an enemy in order to win on an issue over things such as territory or oil.
Power Transition Theory
(3rd level of analysis: cycles of war and peace)
-theory that war is likely when a dominant great power is threatened by the rapid growth of a rival's capabilities, reducing the difference in their relative power.
Cyclical Theories
(LONG CYCLE THOERY)
(3rd level of analysis: cycles of war and peace)
-argues that cycles of world leadership and global war have existed over the past five centuries with a "general war" errupting approximately once every century (irregular intervals)
????Misperception
???
Long Peace
long periods of peae between any of the strongest great powers (militarily)
????POWER CHARECTERISTICS?
???
???SECURITY DEFINITION???
condition in which the sovereignty and teritorial integrity of a state are gaurenteed