Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
21 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Definition of Contrct |
“a promise or a set of promises for the breachof which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law in someway recognizes as a duty.” OR "a voluntary exchange of bargained-for legal detriment between competent parties supported by adequate offer, acceptance, and consideration" |
|
Meeting of the Minds |
two parties meet to chat and come to an agreement |
|
The Objective Theory of Contracts |
suggests that parties will be bound by terms that a reasonable (external) person would, by review of outward facts, statements and/or actions, conclude are the terms of the agreement. |
|
Bilateral Contracts |
Two promises Thecontract is formed when the offeror and offeree exchange promises to each othersupported by agreement and consideration |
|
Unilateral Contracts |
Only one promise The offeror phrases or submits the offer in a way that the offeree(s) may accept only by performance; a “promise for an act”. (ex. lost dog) |
|
Expressed Contract |
terms of agreement are set forth either in writing or orally. |
|
Implied Contract |
based on conduct of the parties (ex. when you go to a restaurant you expect food/drink in exchange for money.. classic implied contract at a restaurant) |
|
Elements of a Valid Contract |
1. Agreement 2. Consideration 3. Capacity 4. Legality |
|
The Mailbox Rule |
Acceptance valid from the moment offeree mails. Offeror is bound unless revocation isreceived by offeree prior to offeree’s mailing of acceptance |
|
Termination by Action of the Parties |
1. Revocation 2. Rejection 3. Counteroffer (offeree becomes new offeror) |
|
Mirror-Image Rule |
at CL, requires that offeree accepts exactly the same terms as offeror’s offer forthere to be a binding contract |
|
Termination by Operation of Law |
1. Lapse of time 2. Destruction of the specific subject matter of the offer 3. Death or incompetence of the offeror or offeree 4. Supervening illegality of proposed contract |
|
Consideration |
A promise to do something that one has no prior legal duty to do, performance of action one is otherwise not obligated to undertake, or forbearance of action that one otherwise has a right to undertake. |
|
Nominal Consideration |
not much of anything, minimal, but sufficient enough to do the job. |
|
Sham Consideration |
something that is exchanged that is clearly solely to provide an illusion of a contract but really no contract exists. |
|
Executed Contract |
fully performed by both sides |
|
Executory Contract |
at least one of the parties has not performed |
|
Unenforceable Contract |
contract that is not enforceable due to question of: |
|
Voidable Contract |
gives a party an option to void contractual obligations or to ratify and follow through |
|
Void Contract |
actually never a contract by definition; it began life as unable to be one |
|
Urhahn Construction vs. Hopkins |
Agreed on a construction job. Price included cinder blocks (standard procedure), but decided to use durisol blocks instead (more expensive). Billed homeowner the difference, they said no because there was no contract. Construction company wins because implied contract, a reasonable person would agree that you have to pay more for more expensive material. |