• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

ELICITED

Classical conditioning response

EMITTED

Operant response

Response latency


Test trials – presenting the CS alone every so often


Intensity of the response

Measuring Pavlovian Conditioning

Contingency

if-then statement

CS-US Contiguity


In general, more contiguous the better… but this does depend on the response

closeness in time between two events

blocking

So novel stimuli likely to be more effective ..... but ..... not in combination with previously conditioned stimuli

Intertrial Interval


The longer (ie., 20-30 secs or more) the gap between successive trials the better

Stimulus Substitution Theory


(Pavlov)


Conditioning causes a new neurological connection between the CS and UR somewhere in the brain


Rescorla-Wagner Model

The amount of conditioning that can occur is limited by the nature of the


US (e.g., meat vs bread)


UR (only so much slobber!)


Conditioning


Aversion Therapy

A form of counter-conditioning … used when the use of certain positive reinforcers (e.g., cigarettes, alcohol, sex, food) is troublesome or inappropriate.