• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/39

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

39 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

The study of mind, brain & behavior

Psychological science

Everything not directly observable; mental activity; ex. Perceptions, thoughts & feelings

Mind

Any directly observable action by humans (& animals)

Behavior

Source and location of the mind

Brain

The ability to systematically question and evaluate evidence

Critical thinking

Focusing attention only on one's personal beliefs

Confirmation bias

Judging if a person relaying info is believable



Remember: attractiveness & authority are key to believability

Source credibility

Variables that occur in time/space a lot; they tend to make us draw conclusions that one causes the other

Spurious correlations/relationships

The ice cream and high rate of crime correlation would be an example of

Spurious correlation/relationship

Deals with how information is framed to manipulate audience's feelings/thinking

Bad/relative comparison

Suppose researchers are proposing a new drug to 1000 participants.


A) the researchers say 600/1000 will live if they take the drug & the ppl are more likely to go along with it


B) the researchers say 400/1000 will die & the participants are terrified.



The way this same info is presented yet the reactions are different when framed differently is an example of

Bad/relative comparison

Explanations after the fact; for example after a break up "I should've known better. The signs were there"

Hindsight bias

"Self serving bias"; people who know the least about a topic seem to be the most confident about it

Dunning-Kruger effect

Why can't psychologists say nature (innate biology) is the sole factor in development?

Wouldn't be able to explain how people change & learn from experience

Why can't psychologists say nurture (environment & Xp) is the sole factor in development?

Wouldn't explain, for example, how people act like family they have never met (like adopted siblings being separated and yet they act alike)

Idea that mind and body are separate, yet intertwined. The mind is divine.

Dualism

The mind "comes" from brain activity and is not separate

Monism

Some behaviors come from genes; explains useful mental & psychological traits as adaptations (products of natural selection)

Evolutionary psychology

Emphasizes environmental effects on observable behavior; rejected "nature" & scientifically studying the mind



Stimulus ➡ unknown ➡ response

Behaviorism

Putting mind back into psychology; study it scientifically because behaviorism couldn't explain complex behavior; viewed mind as a computer



Stimulus ➡ {unknown} ➡ response



{Represented by cognition (language, memory, beliefs)}

Cognitive psychology, revolution

Developed after the Holocaust; focuses on the power of the situation & on the way people are shaped through their interactions with others

Social psychology

Be open to new ideas but wary of new findings when good evidence & sound reasoning don't support them

Amiable skepticism

To be a good critical thinker, you need to evaluate _____ , consider ____ ______, question ______ of ______, and be ____ ______

Evaluate reasoning


Consider alternative explanations


Question biases of sources


Be amiably skeptical

Selective sampling, choosing to take in info that only supports your beliefs, is an error associated with

Confirmation bias

Believing in appeals to authority, or only believing something b/c someone said it, is an error associated with

Failing to accurately judge source credibility

Misjudging patterns that are only chance occurences

Going with your gut(not using stats properly)

Poor reasoning influenced by a few extreme examples rather than avg occurrence is an error assoc with

Going with your gut (not using stats properly)

Judgments based on faulty relationships that are merely coincidence is an error assoc with

Seeing relationships that don't exist

Over or under estimating risks is an error associated with

Relative comparison

Reasoning errors that influence ppl to believe faulty claims about past events that couldn't have been predicted is assoc with

Hindsight bias

Simple rules; "rules of thumb; help ppl make quick decisions

Heuristics

Using this can bias reasoning by causing ppl to make poor judgments about how risky a situation is, or can influence stereotypes

Heuristics

Overestimating one's own abilities; being unable to judge one's own behavior/abilities well b/c they aren't knowledgable about the situation is an error assoc with

Self serving bias

Uses introspection (participants report exactly what they experience in response to a stimulus) to study the smallest units of the mind or XP

Structuralism

Rejected introspection and focuses on reason for a behavior (evol history)

Functionalism

Rejected structuralism & focused on bigger pic, the whole is greater or different than the sum of its parts

Gestalt theory (psychology)

Most of the mind is unconscious; used to investigate symbolism in dreams & repressed memories

Psychoanalytic theory

Study consistency in how the same person behaves in different circumstances

Personality psychology

Using psychological research to examine how people think and when/why they draw erroneous conclusions

Psychological reasoning