Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
7 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
what kind of crimes does this problem arise |
result crimes |
|
|
but for causation |
Lourie v HM Adv |
|
|
existing contributory causes |
think skull rule Bird V HMA old person heart attack |
|
|
does this include psychological issues |
yes R v Blaue, jehovah witness blood transfusion |
|
|
Supervening |
treated as matter of foreseeability, was outcome and intervening foreseeable the act must be extrinsic unreasonable HM ADV V Khaliq R v Kennedy |
|
|
Malreginem |
normal medical treatment is foreseeable, Finlayson v Hm Adv not about degree of fault, rather the consequences of that treatment R v Cheshire |
|
|
New Driving Offences |
driving unqualified etc, strict liability weak causation requirement R v Williams |
