• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/3

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

3 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

caparo v dickman- duty of care, was the harm reasonably foreseeable, proximity and fair and just policies.

donoughue v dickman- duty of care for the harm being foreseeable, was drinking ginger beer and found a decomposed snail at the bottom. a manufacturer has a duty of care towards its buyers and must take reasonable care to avoid acts which are likely to be harmed.

mcloughlin v o'brian- reasonable forseeability of damage, mother successfully claimed compensation for psychiatric injury as it was reasonable foreseeable.

bolam v friern Barnett hospital- the standard of a reasonable competent man exercising that skill or profession must attain that standard.

nettleship v weston- learner driver is tested by a reasonable professional.

Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington hospital- a casualty officer failed to examine patient who later died but would've died anyway, factual causation.