Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
11 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Terry v Ohio |
Police officers must make stops and perform limited searches for the interest of the public safety, under specific conditions, probable cause is not required. |
|
|
Rochin v CA |
Restrictions on improper seizure of evidence "shocks the conscience" |
|
|
Kyllo v. Us (thermal imaging) |
- the use of thermal imaging devices to obtain information from a public vantage point requires a search warrant aimed to protect the fourth amendment rights. |
|
|
Katz v US (privacy) |
two prong test (ruled by the supreme court) first the individual must show that he/she expected privacy, second, the expectation should be reasonable.
|
|
|
Carrol V. US (mobility) |
if there is probable cause, an automobile, because of its mobility, may be searched without a warrant in circumstances that would not satisfy a warrantless search of house or office |
|
|
Chimel v Ca (arm span search) |
in addition to searching premises, the police can seatch a person incident to arrest (or at the time of the arrest) as well as the area that is in the immediate arm span (reach) of the supsect. |
|
|
Schmerber v Ca (drunk driving seizure) |
the state may, over the suspects protest, have a physician extract blood from a person suspected of of drunk driving without violating the suspects fourth amendment rights./5th |
|
|
Whren v US (pretextual stops) |
Stopping a vehicle for a traffic violation in order to conduct a full scale search of the car pretextual stops as acceptable police tactic |
|
|
Wong Sun v US (fruit of the poisonous tree). |
the court explained that police misconduct does not require the entire case to be dismissed, but only the tainted evidence or "fruit" resulting from that misconduct. |
|
|
Miranda v Arizona |
before the police can conduct an interrogation, or a questioning of the suspect after an arrest , they must inform the suspects of his or her rights |
|
|
Tennesse v Garner |
the court explained that deadly force is unjustified when the suspect poses no immediate danger to the officer or public |
