• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Experience Rating Formula
Mod = ZR + (1-Z)
Z= credibility
R = Ratio of actual to expected losses
Calculating the Mod
(# of claims in group)/(Earned premium in group at present 0 yrs. claims-free rates) /
(# of claims in class) / (earned premium in class at present 0 yrs. claim-free rates)
Calculating R
Yrs Claims Free R
1+ 0
0 1/(1-exp(-lambda))

lambda = # claims from class / earned car years of insureds in class
When to use a premium base for frequency
Hazam states that a premium base only eliminates maldistribution if:
1. High frequency territories are also high avg. premium territories
2. Territorial rate differentials are proper
Poisson formula
Pr(X=k) = lambda ^ k * exp(-lambda) / (k!)
Conclusion of paper
1. The experience of a single car for 1 year has significant and measurable credibility for experience rating.
2. Individual risk experience is more credible when there is more variance in loss experience within a risk class, which occurs in less refined risk classification systems.
3. The credibilities for varying years of experience should increase in proportion to the # of years of experience.
Credibility for 2 and 3 years of experience relative to 1 year
The credibility increases in proportion to the # of years only for low credibilities
The closer the credibilities for 2 and 3 years of experience are to 2 and 3 times the 1 year credibility, then the less variation in insured's probability of an accident. This could be due to:
1. Less risks entering/exiting the portfolio.
2. Risk characteristics not changing much over time.
Buhlmann credibility
Suppose X is a random variable with some distribution with parameter Theta, and Theta itself is a random variable with some distribution and additional parameters. In that case, the credibility of a sample of n observations from X is given by:

Z = n/(n+k)
n= # of claims in sample
k = E(Var(X|Theta)) / (Var(E(X|Theta))