• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/5

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

5 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
PERSONAL JURISDICTION (Basic Idea)
Involves one question: ccan P sue D in this STATE?

Not concerned w/ what COURT we go to in state court.
PERSONAL JURISDICTION (Analysis)
Whether there is personal jurisdiction is a TWO-STEP analysis:
(1) Satisfy a statute (e.g. a state long-ar statute;
AND
(2)Satisfy the Constitution (Due Process)
PERSONAL JURISDICTION (Difference in Analysis b/w State and Federal Court)
There is no difference in the analysis whether the case is filed in federal court or state court.
In Personam Jurisdiction
P wants to impose a personal obligation on D. J/d is over the person, not her property, b/c of some contact b/w D & forum State.
In Personam Jurisdiction (Statutory Analysis)
•Most states have a series of statutes that allow PJ in a variety of contexts, such as PJ over Ds who:
o Are served with process in the state; OR
o Are domiciled in the state; OR
o Do certain things (e.g., commit a tortious act in state; enter a K; conduct business) in the state; OR
o Otherwise conset to Jurisdiction

•CA is pretty easy b/c