• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/82

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

82 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Precedent
requires that judges decide current cases based on previous rulings
common law
the accumulation of precedent based on case after case makes up common law ie judge made law
statute
a law passed by a legislative body
writ
a latter from the central government ordering a court to hear a case
substantive rules of law
state the rights of the parties
procedural rules
tell how a court should go about settling disputes
equity
a court's power to fashion a remedy such as an injunction which the common law does not provide
stare decisis
means "let the decision stand"; the principle that precedent is binding on later cases
injunction
a court order that someone stop doing something
criminal law
prohibits certain behavior that threatens society
civil law
regulates the rights and duties between parties
substantive law
defines the rights of the parties
procedural law
establishes the processes for settling disputes
public law
refers to the rights and obligations of governments as they deal with the nation's citizens
private law
regulates the duties between individuals
jurisprudence
the philosophy of law
sovereign
the recognized political power whom citizens obey
legal positivism
law is that the sovereign say
natural law
an unjust law is not law at all
legal realism
who enforces the law counts more than what is in writing
litigator
a lawyer who handles court cases
litigation
the process of filing claims in court and ultimately going to trial
alternative dispute resolution
any other formal or informal process used to settle disputes without resorting to trial
class action
a suit in which one injured party represents a large group of people who have suffered similar harm
appellant
the party filing the appeal
appellee
the party opposing the appeal (because it won at trial)
briefs
written arguments of the case
federal question case
a case in which the claim is based on the United States constitution, a federal statute, or a federal treaty
diversity jurisdiction
the plaintiff and the defendant are citizens of different states and the amount in dispute is more than $75,000
pleadings
the documents that begin in a lawsuit (the complaint, answer and sometimes a reply)
default judgement
a decision that the plaintiff wins without a trial because the defendant failed to answer in time
class action
one plaintiff represents the entire group of plaintiffs including those who are unaware of the lawsuit or even unaware they were harmed
interrogations
written questions that the opposing party must answer in writing under oath
depositions
provide a chance for one's lawyer to questions the other party or potential witness under oath
deponent
the person being questioned
motion for a protective order
a request that the court limit recovery
summary judgement
a ruling by the court that no trial is necessary because some essential facts are not in dispute
voir dire
the process of selecting a jury
challenges for cause
a claim that a juror has demonstrated probable bias
peremptory challenges
the right to excuse a juror for virtually any reason
preponderance of the evidence
the plaintiffs burden in a civil lawsuit
beyond reasonable doubt
the government's burden in a criminal prosecution
cross-examine
to ask questions of an opposing witness
directed verdict
a ruling that the plaintiff has entirely failed to prove some aspect of her case
judgement non obstante veredicto
a judgement not withstanding the jury's verdict
affirm
to allow the decision to stand
modify
to affirm the outcome but with changes
reverse and remand
to nullify the lower decision and return the case for reconsideration on retrial
reverse
to turn the loser into the winner
harmless error
a mistake by the trial judge that was too minor to affect the outcome
tort
wrong; a violation of a duty imposed by the civil law
intentional torts
harm caused by a deliberate action
negligence and strict liability
injuries cause by neglect and oversight rather than by deliberate conduct
defamation
concerns false statements that harm someone's reputation
libel
written defamation
slander
oral defamation
element
a fact that a plaintiff must prove to win a lawsuit
elements in a defamation case
defamatory statement, falseness, communicated, injury
opinion
is generally a valid defense in a defamation suit because it cannot be proven true or false
actual malice
the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard of the truth
absolute privilege
a witness testifying in a court or legislature may never be sued for defamation
qualified privilege
exists between two people who have a legitimate need to exchange information
false imprisonment
the intentional restraint of another person without reasonable cause and without consent
intentional infliction of emotional distress
results from extreme and outrageous conduct that causes serious emotional harm
battery
an intentional touching of another person in a way that is unwanted or offensive
assault
occurs when a defendant does some act that makes a plaintiff fear imminent battery
conversion
taking or using someone's personal property without consent
fraud
injuring another person by deliberate deception
single recovery principle
requires a court to settle the matter one and for all by awarding a lump sum for past and future expenses
punitive damages
intended to punish the defendant for conduct that is extreme and outrageous
tortious interference with a contract
the defendant improperly induced a third party to breach a contract with the plaintiff
tortious interference with a prospective advantage
malicious interference with a developing economic relationship
intrusion
a tort if a reasonable person would find the invasion of her private life offensive
five elements to win a negligence case
duty of due care, breach, factual cause, foreseeable harm, injury
dram acts
make businesses liable for serving drinks to intoxicated customers who later cause harm
licensee
such as a guest, is entitled to a warning of hidden dangers
invitee
who has the right to enter the property, is entitled to reasonable care from the landowner
re ipsa loquitar
the facts imply that the defendant's negligence caused the accident
contributory negligence
if the plaintiff is even slightly negligent they recover nothing
comparative negligence
a plaintiff may generally recover even if they're partially responsible
strict liability
a higher level of liability resulting from ultrahazadous acts or defective products
warranty
a contractual assurance that goods will meet certain standards