• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/41

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

41 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
1. An employee who is leaving a place of employment cannot solicit other employees and clients to come with him to his new job if he has signed an agreement not to compete
True
3. An oral fully executor contract for the sale of land is not binding on either party because of the lack of writing
true
4. In order for a writing to be sufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds requirement it can be less complete as to the terms if the contract is for $1700 to provide services to maintain a car over a two year period than if it is for $17,000 to purchase a car
false
6. If a clause in a contract is grossly unfair, the court may find the clause unconscionable and may enforce the remaining parts o the contract and modify the unfair clause to make it fair
true
7. Jim could not buy an auto insurance policy on the car of his friend Cary, because he would be wagering and it is illegal to do so if he had no insurable interest in the car
true
if defrauded, contract is voidable, not void
true
8. If a firm terminates an employee, the agreement not to compete clause in the employment contract is usually still valid and enforceable
true
9. Wagering is illegal except where allowed by a specific statute because it involves creating a risk in order to assume it
true
9. Wagering is illegal except where allowed by a specific statute because it involves creating a risk in order to assume it
true
14. An agreement not to compete can be enforced if it is ancillary to (part of) a contract for the sale of a business, is reasonable as to time and area and is necessary to protect goodwill
true
15. The statement “sell Andrea whatever groceries she needs up to a value of $600 and I will pay for them” is not enforceable unless it is in writing and signed by the person making the statement
true
16. A person who lacks capacity because of mental illness is generally given more rights by the law of contracts than an intoxicated person
true
17. According to the provisions of the Statute of Frauds some contracts require written evidence signed by both parties to be enforceable
false
18. If a court follows the precedent of the flying school case, a minor can disaffirm a contract and receive her money back even if she has consumed the value she received
true
19. In the case discussed in class, the person who orally agreed to sell a piece of land was required by the court to do so because even though it was not in writing, he admitted to the agreement while testifying under oath
true
21. A clause in contract in which a person eliminates their liability for their own negligent acts is an unconscionable clause and can never be enforced
false
23. If there is a mistake by only one party to the contract, that party cannot void the contract if the mistake was not obvious and the non-mistaken party was not taking advantage of the mistaken party
true
lack of voluntary consent by one of the parties usually makes the contract void
false
voidable contract may be voided if it is done in a reasonable time since voiding the contract is an equitable remedy
true
an agreement to commit a tort or crime is void and unenforceable
true
29. An exculpable clause is one where a party seeks to avoid liability for their own intentional tortuous conduct such as defamation
false
30. In most states, a minor who misrepresents her age can disaffirm the contract and can be held liable in tort law for the misrepresentation (fraud)
true
31. A contract entered into when a person believed they were under duress even if the other party did nothing wrong is voidable
false
32. A contract entered into when the parties are both mistaken as to a material fact is voidable by either party to the contract
true
33. The act of a minor after the minor has reached the age of majority by which she accepts a contract entered into when she has a minor defines
ratification
34. Lisa, age 17, buys an iPad from 20 year old Nick. She pays $100 for the iPad. It turns out that the iPad is really worth $500. Nick wants to disaffirm the contract and get the iPad back. Which of the following best describes the situation?
c. Since Lisa is a minor, this contract is voidable, and Lisa can get the $100 by returning the iPad to Nick
35. Jamie was an accountant with an established practice in a small town. Desiring to retire, Jamie offered to sell her business to Mark for $190,000. She told him that she had made an 8% return on her investment during the last 5 years. Her records clearly indicated that his was true. Relying on this, Mark purchased the business. He had a net loss of $18,000 the first year
c. Mark has no remedy, as Jamie’s statement was factual but did not indicate what kind of return he would receive
36. Robert is aspiring to be an attorney. To get some practice before he goes to law school, he offered to provide any legal services that Samantha needed from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010 for $500. Samantha did not pay the $500 and Robert sued. What result?
The contract is void and Robert cannot enforce it
36. Robert is aspiring to be an attorney. To get some practice before he goes to law school, he offered to provide any legal services that Samantha needed from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010 for $500. Samantha paid the $500 and Robert refused to provide legal services because he was not licensed. Samantha paid $600 to receive the services elsewhere and sued Robert
Samantha is entitled to recover the $600 she paid for services elsewhere
38. The Parole Evidence Rule
Allows admission of evidence that clarifies ambiguities in the contract, Allows admission of evidence that fills in gaps in the contract, AS WELL AS : obvious error, show fraud, duress, etc.
The minor’s liability for a necessity
limited to the value received under the concept of Quasi contract, Requires that the item be a necessity to live such as food, clothing, and shelter, and Requires that the item was not available from a parent or guardian
40. A co-signer
Is making a collateral promise so it needs written evidence, on a consumer credit must sign a statement that explains their obligation, and Is liable for payment when the original debtor defaults
41. Megan was a financial advisor to Bill. She convinced him to loan money to a local restaurant owner. She did not tell him that the owner was her brother and that he was having financial problems. Also, she was a part owner of the restaurant. The contract
Is voidable because of undue influence
the following may be illegal, which is possibly legal
A promise not to compete
the following may be illegal, which cannot be legal
(none of the above - promise to restrain trade, promise by unlicensed person, promise to not be liable for one's own negligent actions)
44. Which of the following would not result in a ratification of fully executed contract that Matt entered into in Indiana as a minor
none of above
45. Kevin contracts with Sarah to purchase a computer from her and pays her $500. Sarah decides to steal a computer and delivers the stolen computer to Kevin. The true owner gets the computer back from Kevin and Kevin sues Sarah for breach of contract. What result
b. The court will order Sarah to pay Kevin $500 because the contract could have been performed legally and therefore was not void
47. If the courts find one part of a contract to be illegal, but the rest of the contract is legal and the contract can be enforced without the illegal clause, the court is likely to
enforce only the legal part of the contract
48. The following would create a voidable contract
b. A wrongful act that induces another to enter into a contract and Abuse of a position of influence that induces another to enter into a contract
49. Natalie is a real estate agent; however she does not have nor has she ever had a license as required by a statute. Natalie sells a piece of property for Mick, but Mick refuses to pay her the agreed upon commission. Natalie sues Mick. What result
a. If the licensing statute is a regulatory statue, Natalie cannot collect
b. If the licensing statue is a revenue raising statue, Natalie can collect
50. The following would require written evidence under the statute of frauds
A fully executory contract for the sale of real estate, A fully executory contract for the sale of goods over $500, and A contract entered into on November 10, 2009 to employ someone beginning March 1, 2010 until December 24, 2010