• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/15

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

15 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What is a Master Production
Schedule? (I)
• It is an anticipated schedule for
producing specific end-products
– In what weeks do I need to produce
(replenish) Cell Phone A, Cell Phone B etc.
What is a Master Production
Schedule? (II)
• Anticipated
– It might be changed at a later date
• Schedule
– Timing of production/replenishment a key decision
• Specific
– Can’t make an aggregate product - have to make
an actual specific product
• End-product
– Master production schedule specifies the timing of
replenishments for the end product not the timing
of replenishments for all the input components
Production Planning - The big picture
Aggregat Production Planning ->
Master Production Scheduling ->
Material Requirements Planning
Aggregate Production Planning
Product Families
monthly plans
Master Production Scheduling
Individual Products
weekly, daily plans
Material Requirements Planning
Product Components
weekly, daily plans
Steps in Creating a Master
Production Schedule
• Disaggregate the aggregate product forecasts
into specific product forecasts
– Go from planning at a family level to planning at an
individual product level
– There is an art and a science to disaggregating
family level forecasts to individual product forecasts
– We will not be covering disaggregation in this course
• Determine timing requirements for
replenishments
– In what weeks do I need to replenish Cell Phone A, cell Phone B, etc.
The MPS Determines What Sales Can Promise to Customers
• At some stage forecasts turn into actual customer
orders
– Remember that actual orders (demand) may differ from what
was forecast
• Before a sales person finalizes a customer order
he/she needs to know whether the order can be met
– What if a customer orders 100 units and the company only
has 50 units?
• Sales needs to know how many units are “available to promise" to customers
Available to Promise (ATP)
Calculations
•Current week
– ATP = Starting Inventory – Sum of Customer Orders up to
but not including order in week of next MPS replenishment
• MPS replenishment week
– ATP = MPS Shipment Size - Sum of Customer Orders from
this replenishment week up to next MPS replenishment
week (include the order in this replenishment week but not
the order in the next replenishment week)
• Last MPS replenishment week in planning
horizon
– ATP = MPS Shipment Size - Sum of Customer Orders from this replenishment week up to end of horizon (include the order in this replenishment week)
Your Initial Answer Might Be No
But can actually be wrong.
Can use some of the ATP from earlier weeks to fill orders.
Implementing Successful ATP
Systems Can be Challenging
• Lots of sales people checking on availability
• Companies make lots of products
– Customers sometimes place orders for multiple
products and want to know if the whole order can
be met
• Answer needs to be fast
– Customers might not wait around
• Answer needs to be accurate
– Customers won’t be happy if you promise and then fail to deliver on time
Is There Ever a Reason to Change the
MPS Replenishment Schedule
• The schedule is based on a forecast
– Customer orders come in which may well be
different from forecasts
• Orders get accepted or rejected based on the initial MPS
– Projected on hand and available to promise numbers get updated
• Scheduler may see an opportunity to revise the MPS replenishment dates so as to better meet demand
– But changing schedules can cause problems for people working to the original schedule
Schedulers Engaged in a
Constant Balancing Act

Keep Replenishment Schedule as is
Pro: Operations function can
focus on efficiency without
worrying about changes

Con: May reject a customer
order than could have been met
Schedulers Engaged in a
Constant Balancing Act

Change Schedule
Pro: May be able to accept a customer order

Con: Operations function needs
to juggle with changing schedules which may hurt efficiency
Schedulers Use Concept of Frozen Zone
Frozen Zone: No Changes (unless high level authorization)

Slushy Zone: Scheduler may make some changes

Liquid Zone: Scheduler makes frequent changes