• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/26

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

26 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Defining terms

STEP analysis

Fahey & Narayanan 4 stage step analysis

What is IOE thought

Industrial organisation economic

What is SCP model

Structure-conduct-performance

Porters five forces framework

Threat of entry (2)

Barriers to entry


Retaliation from incumbents

Barriers to entry (7)

Supply side economies of scale


●Demand side benefits of scale


●Customer switching costs


●Capital requirements


●Incumbency advantages independent of size


●Equal access to distribution channels


●Restrictive government policy

Expected retaliation-likely to fear if: (4)

Previously responded vigorously to new entrants


●Possess substantial resources to fight back


●Likely to cut prices to retain market share


●Industry growth slow-have to steal market share


Supplier group powerful if: (6)

●Supplier group more concentrated than industry


●Does not depend heavily on industry for revenues


●Industry faces swithing costs


●Suppliers offer products that are differentiated


●No substitutes


●Supplier can threaten to integrate into industry

Power of buyers


Buyers have negotiated leverage if: (4)

1 few buyers/each one large volumes


2 industry products standardised/undifferentiated


3 buyers face switching costs


4 credibly threaten to integrate backwards

Power of buyers


Price sensitive if: (4)

1 products represent significant fraction of cost structure/budget


2 earns low profits/strapped for cash


3 quality of buyers products little affected by industry's products


4 indusrty products has little affect on buyers other costs

Threat of substitute high if: (2)

1 it offers an attractive price - performance trade off with industrys products


2 buyers costs of switching to substitute low

Rivalry among existing competitors


Intensity of competition greatest if: (5)

1. Competitors numerous and roughly equal in size and power


2. Industry growth slow. Fights for market share.


3. Exit barriers high.


4. Rivals highly committed/aspirations for leadership


5. Firms cannot read each others signals

Price competition most likely to occur if: (4)

1. Products nearly identical and low switching costs.


2. Fixed costs high and marginal costs low.


3. Capacity must be expanded in large increments to be efficient


4. Products are perishable

Zero sum competition

One firms loss is anothers gain.


If many compete on same attributes/meet same needs likely result in zero sum, driving down profitability.

Positive sum competition

No one wins at anothers expense.


Meeting needs of different segments-support higher profitability and possibly expand industry

Analysing the competitive environment (2)

Strategic group analysis (Mcgee and Thomas)


Competitor analysis-porters generic strategies


Shareholder theory



Grants 4 basic arguments for it

1. In a competitive world, those not seeking profit maximisation will lose its existence


2. Managers not single mindedly pursuing profits will be replaced by owners


3. Interests of stakeholders will inevitably be served better by emphasis upon profit maximisation


4. Diluting organisations purpose with other considerations adds unnecessary complexity

Stakeholder analysis


Richard lynch (2)

● those who carry out actions of stratgey


● those who have a stake in the outcome

Stakeholder analysis


Hitt et al (3)

● capital market stakeholders


●product market stakeholders


●organisational stakeholders

Stakeholder power matrix - 2 axis


Winstanley et al

1. Operational power


2. Criteria power

Stakeholder power matrix-4 segments


Winstanley et al

A. Arms length power


B. Comprehensive power


C. Operational power


D. Disempowered

Prioritising stakholders


Mitchell et all stakholder typology (7)

1. Dormant stakeholder


2. Discretionary stakeholder


3. Demanding stakeholder


4. Dominant stakeholder


5. Dangerous stakeholder


6. Dependant stakeholder


7. Definitive stakeholder

What is IOE

Industrial Organisation Economic

What is SCP

Structure Conduct Performance