• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/30

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

30 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Boundaries of trade zones

30 to 30

BATS is

at 32 N in Sargossa Sea

__________ have lower ______ and are ________________ than the zones ________ to _________ affected by _____________

central gyres, surface chlorophyll, less productive 15 N to 15 S, equatorial upwelling

key feature of subtropical gyres


also


dominant phytoplnkton

water column stability


water clarity, PS to 125 m


picoplankton

summer vs winter cyanobacteria

prochlorococcus, syenochocccus

limiting nutrients NPSG andSargasso Sea

N and P; n probably more than p

Liebig

one nutrient compound in least supply relate to plant requirements would be factor limiting plant growth

What prochlorococcus good at and why

deal with extremely low phosphorous and iron


has sulfolipids rather than phospholipids


absence of nitrate reductase saves on iron

HNLC

high nitrogen low chlorophyll; iron is liebigian nutrient

upward nutrient mixing in gyres

consonant with cyclonic eddies being primary mechanism

measuring bulk diazatrophy 1

put acetylene over sample and measuring ethylene produced

measuring bulk diazatrophy 2

label 15N2 and introduce; organic matter produced is then labeled and can be extracted and measured with mass spectrometry

limiting factors of diazatrophy

temp, irradiance, phosphate, iron


iron most important

diaztrophy saragsso vs NPSH

greater in atlantic; iron from saharan desert carried west by trade and thus P becomes limiting nutrient



no iron in NPSH

redfield ratio

N:P about 16 - 1

grazing in NPSH

keeps phytoplankton at almost exact balance; grazers consume all increase in biomass every day



herbivory done by protozoans

mesozooplankton in NPSH

low biomass, 3x more species than higher latitudes

trade winds blow which and where

east to west +-5-20


doldrums over equator


primary productivity shows

slight photoinhibition in eastern tropical pacific equatorial biome

eastern tropical pacific equatorial biome important source of

CO2 for atmosphere (upwelling, brought from deep)

el nino =

reduced nutrients



warm waters, coastal plankton and fish require more food and there is less ofit

shear stress produces

tropical instability waves east to west


50 km per day



picture TIS

vortex in water column; downwelling and northern transport at west, upwelling and west in north



strong dilute nutrients; weak enhance local upwelling that produces productivity

waters in equatorl pacific never

depleted of nitrate, phytoplankton always present



HNLC



iron limitation constrains phytoplankton to small size

TIWs atlantic vs Pacific


phtoplankton vs grazers?

June to October (5 months) vs 9 months


both dominated by picoplankton and heterotrophic protists

four major EBCS (eastern boundary current systems)

California, Peru/Humboldt, Canary, Benguela

3 ways nutrient input in EBCS



limiting

upwelling, ekman transport (75%), turbulent fluxes



nitrate

biomass atlantic ebcs vs pacific

2x as large in atlantic probably due to iron availability



organisms in EBCS

blooms dominated by diatoms; microzooplankton ~60% of grazing pressure

monsoon

winter, moderate winds blow from northeast to southwest accelerating surface waters while coriolis shifts flow towards arabian coast and downwelling, nutrient depletion



opposite in summer, blow towards himalayas from desert, evaporation of desert air moistens and rain