• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Nicholson & Bailey
1935

Balance of animal pop's (comparison to Lotka-Volterra model)
- intrxns cause the densities of anmls to oscillate around steady state (interspecific oscillation)

-age distribution is important
- increase time = incr oscillations
Sinclair & Krebs
2002

Top-down, Bottom-up processes
- Bottom-up is the primary factor determining r

- 3 secondary processes can override it: top-down, social intrxns, stochastic disturbance
Lytle & Merritt
2004

Pop Model (Cottonwood)
Developed a stochastic, density dependent pop model
May
1974

Population stable points, stable cycles
- as r ↑, goes from a stable equilibrium point to stable cyclic oscillations (continuing in #)
-settling into finite cycle depends on initial pop point
Paine
1966
Food Web Complexity

(Removal of barnacle predator species)
- Local species diversity is related to the # of predators in the system and their efficiency in preventing a single species from monopolizing a limiting requisite
Coulson et al
2001

Sheep population density, demography
- Age/sex structure of pop fluctuates independently of pop size

- Survival rates of m/f differ in response to pop density + weather

- Bad weather + high density = depressed survival rates
Connell
1961

Interspecific competition, barnacles
- lower limit of distribution in intertidal is determined by biotic factors (interspecific competition)

-upper limit is set by physical factors
Olson
1995

Life-history stage affects fish interactions (bluegill, bass)
- species interaction depends on the life history stage
- mixed competition/predation intrxn
- competition can reduce bass growth rate (bass ↓ w/ bluegill density ↑)
Lotka Voltera

Predator-prey relationship
- stable oscillations shown in their model
- oversimplified, closed system
- defined important concepts: numerical and functional response of predators, predators can be a regulating force, heterogeneity/perturbations needed to prevent extinction of prey
Kiers et al
2003

Legume-rhizobium mutualism
-soybeans penalize rhizobia that fail to fix N2 inside their root nodules

- hosts can provide a selective environment that favors cooperative behavior
Stachowicz & Whitlatch
2005

Mutualist diversity (kelp)
- diversity of functionally similar mutualists may enhance host species

-mutualist diversity may be important for maintenance of ecosystems
Huffaker
1958

Parasite/Host relationship
- stable oscillations achievable in a closed system

-heterogeneity must be present for prey population to persist
Simberloff & Wilson
1968

Theory of Island Biogeography - insects
- evidence of faunistic equilibrium from the observation of immigration and extinction processes

- supported IBT
Bender & Fahrig
2005

Inter-patch movement, metapopulation theory
- habitat patch size and isolation can be poor predictors of interpatch movement when the landscape contains many different cover types

- movement of habitat generalists may be harder to predict than specialists
Schoener
1971

Feeding Strategies
- Benefit > cost

- optimal diet, foraging space, foraging period, group size
Gause
1934

Pred/prey relationship
- spatial heterogeneity required for persistence of predators and prey

- Lab experiment
Anderson & May
1978

Parasitism and regulation: 3 requirements
1. Non-liner functional response: threshold pt where parasite #'s are large enough to decrease host pop

2. Overdispersion/patchiness

3. Density-dependence within individual host