• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/86

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

86 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
eldely abuse difficult to quantitate ...
-parent may be believe it to be a family affair
-fear of reprisals
-guilt feeling
-cause further tensions in the family
-parent etc. may feel they are the culprit
Data on elderly abuse
USA -.8and 1.9 million abused elders
NC- 33K older adults at a given time
scandanavia 1-2% >65 yrs
Canada - 2.2-3.9%
Japanese <1%
abuse not confined to a particular society/culture
Cost to society/family
-50% of cases lead to physiclaly apparent trauma resulting in admission to hospital
-ultimately affects family life style
-steady increase in reported cases
Abuse types
-physical (14.6%)
-sexual (.3%)
-emotional (7.7%)
-Financial/Material
- Explotiation (12.3%)
-Neglect (55%)
self, active, passiv
-Abandonment (11%)
Population at risk
- Women > Men
- Advanced Age (77.4)
- > dependence on caregiver
-ETOH/Drug abuse in elder/caregiver
-History of intergenerational conflict
-elders who internalize blame
-excessive loyalty to caregiver
Caregiver Risks
-ETOH/Drug Abuse
-Dementia
-Inexperience
-Economic stress
- History of abuse as a child
-Economic dependence on elderly
Family unit characteristics engendering abuse
-lack of family support
-caregiver reluctance
-overcrowding
-isolation
-marital conflict
-violence
Perceptions/Help seeking behavior
- koreans less apt to report abuse
-formal vs informal sources of help
caucasians- informal sources
-Varies across culture as well as from individual to individual
Orofacial sign of physical abuse
-facial bruising
-lip trauma
-fractured teeth/jaw
-red swollen eyes
-unkempt
DENTAL TEAM MEMBERS MUST...
have a working knowledge of medical conditions that mimic accidental trauma (bleeding problems, atrophic signs, frequent falls etc)
DDS Role in Abuse
-complete hx with written description of inury
-photos, radiographs
-Call Adult protective services
-Mandatory reporting of abuse to social service (general statute 108A-102)
-careful interviewing of caregivers suspected abuses who may "speak for the patient"
-watching facial expression/body language of caregiver and patient
interviewing
-have a second person there
-use open ended questions
Social work instruments
-hwalek-sengstock elder abuse screening test
-care giver abuse screen
-both aid in prevention/recognition of elder abuse
FACTS
-all 50 states with legsilation to protect elderly victims of abuse
-42 states with mandatory reporting
-some states have criminal charges against DDS/MD who does not report
-elder abuse is a medical diagnosis and a crime
-must have resources to follow through with reported cases - if not could exacerbate abuse situation
APS (adult protected service) suspected abuse
-can be reported by anyone suspecting abuse
-self abuse/ neglect more common in orange county
-reported most frequently by Home health agencies or health care professional (22.5%)
-one only needs to suspect abuse
-64.2% of reported abuse is substantiated
Process of reporting
-if you suspect elder abuse/neglect call in a referral to the APS (social worker) on call (if after hours) call 911
-if you were wrong you will get a letter saying so
-1-800-752-6200
Required info
-name/age of adult and caregiver
-age of adult
-information that indicated disability
-what was done to harm, mistreat, or exploit the adult in question
Screening criteria- MUST MEET ALL THREE
-Are they disabled?
>18 years of age
lives in NC
physically or mentally handicapped
-have they been abused neglected or exploited?
-are they in need of APS
Abuse
-willful infliction of pain, injury or mental anguish
-willful deprivation of needed services
-unreasonable confinement
-by caretaker generally!
Neglect
Self neglect
-uanble to provide essential services to self
-caretaker neglect: not receiving essential services from caretaker
Exploitation
-illegal or improper use of disabled adult or his resources for another person's advantage
Who needs APS?
any adult unable to perform or obtain essential services and is without an able, responsible and willing person to obtain these services
How quickly are reports followed up?
-emergency: within 24 hours
-routine: within 72 hours
-initiatied by contact with adult about which the report was mde
-f there is reason to believe abuse has occurred law enforcment escort for social worker
What further steps are taken?
-consultation with others who might have info aobut adult
-medical pschological, psychiatric evaluation when deemed necessary
-by law all staff/ MD's at health depts mental helath and public or private facilities must cooperate
-conservative investigation
detmination fo capacity or competence
Capacity: DSS decision; temporary; decision used for services authorai
Competency: clerk of superior court decision; long-term decision used for guardianship
What determines if services are rendered or not?
-must fufill 3 screening criteria and
-have capacity and consents to services
-has capacity and refuses services
-legal guardianship proceedings if suspected incompetence
If APS suspects abuse
-report is filed with the district attorney
-a detective is hired to investigate
-case is taken to court but..
-in practice- DA never folows through due to lack of concrete evidence
-APS attempts to fulfill unmet needs of the abused person
Our role as DDS
-be sensitive to prevalence of elder abuse/neglect
-carefully evaluate geriatric patients under the care of a caretaker
-be able to notice signs of abuse/neglect
-know how to notify the proper authorities (DSS-APS)
-document the supsected case of abuse/neglect
Health
- a state of bieng free of disease
-a state of being free of functional consequences of disease
-WHO- a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being
Quality of life
-encompasses all areas of everyday life
-individualistic and subjective
-4 components:
physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being
Health related QOL
Measured by:
-objective assessment of functioning of health
-subjective perception of health
Why is it important?
-can detemrine the overall benefit of a treatment
Context for Chronic Illness
-Ageing society: increasing life expectancy and proportion of elderly
-more than 12 million people about 1/2 <65 years and 1/2>65 years
-long term care demands for people over 65 years will more than double in the next 30 years
-increase in disability
Chronic Illness
-largest expenditure of health care dollars
-system geared towards episodic management of health needs
-separate systems for health services and social services
-medicare- does not cover social services
-medicaid - provides health and social services for those who meet income requirements
Total spending
-2.6 trillion
on various services
Medicare
-feral program for elders (over 65 years) and people with end stage renal disease
-covers acute medical care
-long term care serices
SNF (skille dnursing faciilty) 100 days following hospital stay of three days
Barriers to service
-perceptions or fears of health care system
-access to care
-43.4 million americans (36%) wthout health insurance
-79% of uninsured are from families with 1 full time worker whose sector does not provide health insurance or whose co-pay for premiums are too expensive
-largest group = children
Pattern of health care service use: prescription drugs
-in 2009 there was a 5.1% growth in prescription drug spending, in 200 1.2% increase - $259.1 billion
-prices have increased
-direct to sonsumer marketing- may increase drug use
Morbidity vs. Mortality
Morbidity- the relative incidence of disease
Mortality- relatie incidence of death
Much of all health care devoted to care of older adults
-57% of all visits to genralist physicians
-50% of hospital expenditures
-80% of home care visits
-90% of nursing home care
3 common chronic conditions
-arthritis
-diabetes
-cognitive impairment
Musculoskeletal system: main functions
-support
-protection of vital organs
-movement
-blood cell production
-mineral storage
Musculoskeletal age-related changes
-subtle loss of height after maturity; significant shortening in old age
-thinning of intervertebral discs, shorteining or collapse of verterbral bodies due to osteoporosis
-decreased bone mass (post memopause)
-kyphosis of aging
Arthritis and Disability
-arthritis is the leading cause of disability for adults in the US
-more than 7 million Americans are limited in their everyday activities
-an estimated 12 million americans will have limitations in daily activities due to arthritis by 2020
Osteoarthritis risk factors
-age (>40 years) strongest factor
-obesity
-family history
-joint hypermobility
Functional assessment: purpose
-detemine ones capacity for activy
-determine level of activity performance
-determine any activity limitations and need for assistance
-intervene to improve, maintain, or enhance one's ability to perform and actual performance of activity
-basic activities of daily living (ADLS)
Functional assessment tools and instuments
-Katz ADL index
-Barthel index for physical functioning
-functional independence measure
-the get up and go test
Katz index
-assesses ADLs
-creates a common language about patient function
Physical Activity
-sedentary lifestyle in america: 50% of adults in US do not do enough
-decrease risk for CHD, stroke, diabetes and HTN
-helps to control weight
-contributes to healthy bones, muscles and joints
-reduces falls among older adults
-helps to relieve arthritic pain
-helps to maintain the functional independence of older adults enhances qualiy of life (all ages)
Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
-hyperglycemia of diabetes
-disordered metabolism: carbs, fat and protein
-structural abnormalities: organs and organ systems (espec. heart, kidneys, eyes)
-complication of pregnancy
-etiology linked to causes such as obesity and stress
Diabetes Statistics
-24 million peple in the US have diabetes
-7 million adults over the age of 65 have diabetes
-12-25% of all hopital discharges have a diagnosis of diabetes
-about 6.2 million people with diabetes are unaware
-57 million in US hae pre-diabetes
Risk factors for diabetes
-age >45
-overweight (bmi >25)
FH diabetes
-sedentary lifestyle
-IFT or IFG
-ethnicities
-history or GDM or deliverying infant > 9 lbs
-hypertension
-low HDL or high TG
-PCOS
-metabolic syndrome: high TG, low HDL, high HDL, insulin resistance, HTN
Classification of DM
Type I : insulin production by beta cells are decreased or absent
Type II: a decrease in insulin sensitivity, insulin production may be normal but target cells are not receptive o insulin (most prevalent)
Type II DM
-most common form of DM
-may not need insulin to survive
-about 1/2 of cases are in people
-prevalence varies by race
Social Support dimesions
-Structural dimensions: living arrangement, # of close relatives and friends, frequency of contact with family and friends, satisfactions of social contact
-Functional Aspects: emotional, instrumental and financial support received from others
-mutual exchange is high between older adults and their family, friends and neighbors
-pattern of mutual exchange varies across culture
Changes of Social Support
-changes with advancing age
-age-related changes in social support vary across different domains
-studies suggest that contacts with friends and family tend to decline with age
-emotional support is relatively stable with age
-instrumental support increases as one gets older
-better social support is associated with mental health, physical health, physical functioning, oral health, and health services use
Social Support Associations
-better preventative health behaviors
-better compliance with preventative medical tx
-greater opportunity to improve health literacy and knowledge of health care services
-better communication with health problems
-better access to health care
-poor social support is associated with elevated stress hormones, heightened CV activity, and depressed immune function
-the number of elderly is growing, however, the number of caregivers is declining
Cost of Informal Caregiving
-significant time commitment from family members and a significant societal economic cost
-informal caregiving for dementia is largest share of caregiving time for older adults and largest societal economic cost
Informal Caregiving: Negative Health Effects
-higher rates of depression and anxiety
-poorer physical health
-increased mortality in strained caregivers
-dementia caregivers have an extremely high risk of developing effective disorders such as major depression and anxiety
-risk persists over many years of caregiving and even after caregiving ends with death of recipient
Negative Impact of Caregiving
-financial impact (financial strain, women caregivers are more likely than men to give up work, chose to retire early, change to part-time employment,and forgo promotions or career development)
Positive Impact of Informal Caregiving
-providing more moderate levels of care may be beneficial to caregiver's health
-lower rates of depression/anxiety compared to non-caregivers
-decreased mortality
-can be rich and rewarding experience
-can create feelings of efficacy and self worth
-can have greater sense of meaning of life
Caregiving: Conclusion
-likely lead to negative and positive effects
Patient's Experience
-70% of Americans die institutional settings
-41% receive Hospice
-40% of pts experience severe pain in days prior to death
-31% families report major financial hardship bc of terminal care costs
Factors important at End of Life
-cleanliness
-alternate decision-maker
-good nursing care
-know what to expect
-someone who will listen
-maintain dignity
-trusted physician
-finances in order
-free from pain
-maintain sense of humor
Goals of Medical Care
-to cure sometimes, to relieve often, and to comfort always
-curing disease and restoring health
-prolonging survival
-restoring of maintaining function
-promoting comfort
-facilitating pt goals (quality of life: staying home, maintaining awareness, living to see a grandchild born, reducing burdens on family)
Advance Directives
-living will (notary, can be individualized) durable health care power of attorney (lawyer)
-Family communication: copy of advance directives, discuss values
-Physician Communication: copy of advance directive, discuss goals, values, tx decisions, ACP note in WEBCIS, consider portable orders: DNR, MOST
Advance Care Planning
-what makes life worth living?
-what health conditions seem worse than death?
-What is most important to pt if diagnosed with a life-limiting illness?
-Does pt have strong opinions about specific tx?
Limitations of living wills
-Documents are not sufficient: 20%adults, 40% chronically ill older persons have them, use associated with educational attainment, ethnicity
-may not be available at the time of crisis; don't travel with pt
-standard language is vague
-muse be discussed and interpreted as health changes
-should physician listen to living will or to family
-documents dont replace communication
Life-prolonging measures
-mechanical ventilation, dialysis, antibiotics, artificial nutrition and hydration, and similar tx
Living Will specifications
-incurable condition with relatively short life expectancy
-unconscious and unlikely to regain consciousness
-advanced dementia
-can prioritize preference or HCPOA
Portable DNR order
-medical order
-issued by MD, NP or PA
-not hypothetical; immediately in effect
-no interpretation, immediately directs care in the event of a cardiac arrest
Tx decisions beyond DNR
-DNR does not mean Do not tx
-resuscitation orders do not direct other txs
-some pts desire DNR but would accept other tx
-some patients desire CPR but want to limit other types of tx
MOST: Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment
-CPR vs DNR
-scope of tx-full, limited additional tx, comfort
-antibiotics-use, determine use, don't use
-IVF/TF: use, use for trial period, don't use
MOST: Communicating decisions
-portable medical order: travels with pt (hospital, home, nursing home), available when needed (pt of care) , re-assess annually, with transfers, with change in health
-Standardized and easily identified: bright color (find it among paperwork), same form for all settings
-More than a DNR order: accept or reject other types of tx
-Signed by patient (surrogate) and MD; also PA or NP: promotes discussion prognosis, risks, and benfits of tx, opportunity to answer questions and make recommendations
Patients that use MOST
-seriously ill with advanced incurable disease
-patients whose life expectancy is months
-generally not intended for healthy pts, pts with functionally disabling problems with many years of life expectancy or pts with stable medical conditions
Prognosis
-prediction of possible future outcomes of a tx, tx options, or a disease course based on medical evidence and on clinical experience
-life expectancy or probability of survival
-experience of illness-trajectory, function, symptoms
Informing prognosis
-disease-specific information
-response to tx
-nutritional status
-functional status
Patients and prognosis
-expectation of living correlated with tx choices
-patients are optimistic
-chronically ill patients value their quality of life more highly than do their families of physicians
Physicians and prognosis
-physicians overestimate survival in advanced cancer
-good discrimination poor calibration
Knowing survival rates
-Helps practical and emotional preparation
-many want to know survival rates
Communicating prognosis
-Discuss what to expect: trajectories
-Communicate time frames not times
- listening improves communication
When to use shared decision-making?
-high risk, high certainty : intermediate discussion
-high risk, low certainty: shared decision making
-low risk, high certainty: simple consent, minimal discussion
-low risk, low certainty: simple consent, some elements of shared decision making
Deciding on overall Tx plan
-MD and pt, family share decision-making
-elicit goals and preferences, make recommendations
-tx matched to primary goals
-setting-ICU hospital, nursing facility, home
Palliative Care
-interdisciplinary care to improve comfort and quality of life for pts and their families who face serious or life-limiting illness
-pain and symptom management
-emotional and spiritual support
-help with difficult tx decisions
Role of palliative care
-palliative care not defined by terminal illness or DNR decision
-marked symptom distress
-Diagnosis of progressive incurable disease
-hospice: life expectancy 6 months of less if disease follows usual course
Palliative Care Improved Outcomes
-improved pt and family satisfaction
-improved pt symptom control and quality of life
-fewer ICU and hospital days
-no change in mortality; may prolong survival for pts with advanced cancer or CHF
Hospice Improves quality
-decreased hospital transfer
-increases use of pain management
-improves family satisfaction with pain management, care for emotional needs
-Hospice probably reduces Medicare costs-more so if cancer, younger pt, LOS 7wks but increases family caregiving costs
-hospice doe not increase mortality