• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/16

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

16 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Untoward Effects of Antibiotics
• Antibiotic resistance
• Adverse drug events (ADEs)
– Hypersensitivity/allergy
– Drug side effects
– Clostridium difficile infection
– Antibiotic associated diarrhea/colitis
• Increased health-care costs
Antibiotics account for 19.3% of drug related adverse events
• 78.7% for allergic events
• 19.2% for adverse events (e.g. diarrhea, vomiting)
– Approximately 50% due to penicillin & cephalosporin classes
– 6.1% required hospital admission
f
Six Goals of Antibiotic
Stewardship Programs
Reduce antibiotic consumption and inappropriate use
• Reduce Clostridium difficile infections
• Improve patient outcomes
• Increase adherence/utilization of treatment guidelines
• Reduce adverse drug events
• Decrease or limit antibiotic resistance
– Hardest to show
– Best data for health-care associated gram negative
organisms
Nine Factors to Consider
When Selecting an Antibiotic
1. Spectrum of coverage
2. Patterns of resistance
3. Evidence or track record for the specified infection
4. Achievable serum, tissue, or body fluid
concentration (e.g. cerebrospinal fluid, urine)
5. Allergy
6. Toxicity
7. Formulation (IV vs. PO); if PO assess bioavailability
8. Adherence/convenience (e.g. 2x/day vs. 6x/day)
9. Cost
Empiric Therapy (85%)
• Infection not well defined
(“best guess”)
• Broad spectrum
• Multiple drugs
• Evidence usually only 2
randomized controlled
trials
• More adverse reactions
• More expensive
Directed Therapy (15%)
• Infection well defined
• Narrow spectrum
• One, seldom two drugs
• Evidence usually
stronger
• Less adverse reactions
• Less expensive
Why So Much Empiric Therapy?
Need for prompt therapy with certain infections
– Life or limb threatening infection
– Mortality increases with delay in these cases
• Cultures difficult to do to provide microbiologic
definition (i.e. pneumonia, sinusitis, cellulitis)
• Negative cultures
• Provider Beliefs
– Fear of error or missing something
– Not believing culture data available
– “Patient is really sick, they should have ‘more’ antibiotics”
– Myth of “double coverage” for gram-negatives e.g. pseudomonas
– “They got better on drug X, Y, and Z so I will just continue those”
Conclusion
• The therapeutic benefit of antibiotics should be
balanced with their unintended adverse
consequences
• Inappropriate antibiotic use is associated with
increased antibiotic resistance, adverse drug
effects and Clostridium difficile infection
• Antibiotic stewardship is important for preserving
existing antibiotics and improving patient outcomes
• Antibiotic prescribing should be prudent, thoughtful
and rational
New Antibiotics decreasing
f
3 principal causes of the antibiotic market
failure:
– Scientific
– Economic
– Regulatory
Scientific
• The “low hanging fruit” has already been
plucked
• With each of the > 100 antibacterial agents
developed in the U.S. since sulfonamides,
the bar has been raised as to what is to
discover and develop the next generation
• Discovery and development of antibiotics has
become scientifically more complex, more
expensive, and more time consuming over
time
-many drugs but few targets
economic
Antibiotics represent a poor return on investment
• Antibiotics are short course therapies, and companies
know that they will make much more money selling a
drug you have to take very day for the rest of your life
• Imbalanced drug pricing in society.
– We will pay $50,000 for a course of cancer chemotherapy
that prolongs life by 3 months, but we don’t want to pay
more than $100 for a course of antibiotics that cures the
target infection.
– Pricing difference is neither rational nor data-driven; there
is no cost-efficacy analysis that supports cancer drug
pricing. Rather, drug pricing in the U.S. is based on public
perception and fear
• People are terrified of cancer, but not of infections
• There is a need to educate the public and payors
about the true value of antibiotics
Telithromycin [Ketex] Effect
• NDA twice rejected before finally being approved in 2004
over the objection of FDA scientists
• July-September 2005 there were two deaths, 35 liver
adverse reactions, 44 cardiac events, and 80 visual
events in Ketek patients
• January 20, 2006: FDA issued a Public Health Advisory
• More than a year for the FDA to finally ban Ketek for use
in two of its 3 approved indications
• Drug is still approved to treat pneumonia
• New labeling warns of acute hepatic failure, including
fatal liver injury, some requiring liver transplants, and
some occurring after only a few doses
Economic
At discovery, the net present value of antibiotic
to a drug company is MINUS $50 million
– HIGH cost of development
– Short duration of treatment
– Limited patient pool
• That compares to a positive $1 billion for a new
musculoskeletal drug
Telithromycin [Ketex] Effect
• FDA simply required demonstration the candidate drug
eliminated symptoms of infection as reliably as the
approved antibiotic
• FDA instead required that applicants needed to show
that patients were no more likely to die — of any
cause — within 28 days of treatment with a new drug
• Patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia already ill,
making it hard to know if candidate drug played a part in
their death
• Of necessity, trials have to be larger for statistical validity
• Relative rarity of infections needing new antibiotics
• Patients should NOT have received other antibiotics
before test agent
GAIN Act 10/1/2012
Incorporated in the FDA Safety and Innovation Act
that reauthorized prescription drug user fees
• Provides added exclusivity for antibiotics and
earmarks antibiotics for Priority Review
• Mandates the creation of a pathogen-focused
antibacterial drug development pathway
• Provides the ability to develop drugs for emerging
multi-resistant pathogens based on the bugs they
kill - regardless of the site of infection
• Mutually agreed upon minimum efficacy datasets
can be obtained practically and rapidly
• With GAIN, political pressure to limit the risk of
adverse effects from antibiotics has been replaced
by congressional calls to reinvigorate product
development