• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/100

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

100 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Standing
1) injury
2) causation and Redressibility
3) ripeness
4) not moot
third party standing
no tax payer suit, citizen suit. exception for tax payer enforcing establishment clause
Mootness exceptions
1) capable of repitition evading review
2) voluntary cessation
3) class action suits (as long as one class member still has injury)
Political questions
Judiciary will not touch
- republican form of gov't clause
- challenges to pres. foreign policy
- impeachment and removal process
- partisan gerry mandering
Supreme court gets cases
- generally writ of cert.
- appeals only from three judge panel
- exclusive jx of suits between states
Supreme Ct- reviewing state court decision
must be final decision, and there cannot be a independant state ground for upholding decision
Sovereign immunity
bars suits against states in state court
exceptions to sovereign immunity
1. wavier
2. federal laws adopted under sec. 5 of fourteenth amendment (discrimination)
3. fed gov't may sue states
4. bankruptcy
5. suits against officers
- injunctions or $$ must come from pocket of officer
Federal Police power
Generally no power except for MILD
military
indian reservation
fed land
D.C.
necessary and proper
Congress can use any means not prohibited to carry out it's power
Congress's power to act
must be express or implied
Congress taxing/spending power must be for:
general welfare
commerce power
Congress can regulate
1) channels (highways)
2) instrumentalities (cars)
3) economic activities that have substantial effect (cannot be used for non-economic activity)
10th amendment limit on Congress's power
Congress cannot compel state statutory or regulatory actiion but can can try to get them to do it by federal grants
- congress can prohibit harmful state activity (selling dmv info)
Congress power under Sec. 5 of 14th amend
cannot create new rights or expand
- act only to prevent or remedy violaitons of rights reconized by the courts and such laws must be proportionate and congruent to remedying constitutional violations
Deglegation of powers
no limit on Congresss delegating power but it cannot delegate executive power to itself or officers
leg. veto and line item veto
unconstitutional
Executive Foreign policy power
1. Treaties (ratified by Senate)
2. Executive agreement
Executive Treaty power
ratified by Senate
- prevail over other conflicting state law
- fed law v. treaty= most recent in time wins
- treaty v. fed. const.= treaty invalid
Executive Agreements
- no senate approval required
- can be used for any purpose
- prevail over conflicting state laws but never over conflicting federal laws or constitution
appointment power
- president appoints ambassadors, federal judges and officers of united states (senate comfirms)
- Congress may vest teh appointment of inferior officers w/ pres
- Congress may not give itself or its officers the appointment power
President's Removal power
pres. may fire any executive employee unless:
- independence from pres. is desirable
note: congress cannot eliminate Pres removal power, just limit it
impeachment and removal of pres. cp, fed judges and officers of US
treason, bribery, or for high crimes and misdemeanors
impeachment=
indictment by house which requires a 2/3 vote
- followed by trail by senate
President's immunity
- absolute immunity for money damages while in office
- no immunity for aks that took place before talking office
executive privilege
covers presidenial papers and conversations but must yield to other important gov't interests
President's pardon power
those accused and convicted of federal crimes except a person impeached cannot be pardoned for actions that led to impeachment
- no civil pardon power
preemption
express or
implied
dormant commer clause
- does not require discrimination against out of staters in order to apply
- requires a burden on interstate commerce
- corporations and aliens can sue under it
- exceptions: Congressional approval and the market participant exception
privileges and immunites clause
- requires discrimination against out of staters in order to apply
- requires discrimination with regard to civil liberties or important economic activities
- corporations and aliens cannot sue under it
- no exceptions
state taxaction of interstate commerce
1. may not use tax system to help in state business
2. must have substantial nexus to state
3. must be fairly apportioned
full faith and credit
court in one state must give full faith and credit to judgment from another state if:
1) jx over parties and subject matter
2) judgment was on merits
3) judgment was final
13th amendment
only slavery violates, not discrimination itself
entanglement exception to gov't action requirement for private rights
const. applies if gov't affirmatively authorizes, encourages, or facilitates unconst. activity.
ex. courts enforcing racially restrictive covenants, gov't leases space to racially restrictive restaurant etc
amendments that do not apply to the states
- 2nd amend rt to bear arms
- 3rd amend rt not to have soldiers quartered
- 5th amend right to grand jury
- 7th amend- right to jury trial in civil cases
- eight amend- right against excessive fines
rational basis test
rationally related to a legitimate gov't purpose
- challenger has the burden
intermediate scrutiny
substantially related to an important government purpose
- gov't has the burden
strict scrutiny
necessary to achieve a compelling gov't purpose
standard for due process violations
gov't negligence is not enough
- must show intentional gov't action or at least reckless action
- under emergency situations, gov't only liable if its conduct "shocks the conscience"
Due Process test
balance
- the importance of the interest to the individual
- the ability of additional procedures to increase the accuracy of the fact finding
- the gov't interests
economic liberties
only rational basis test is used
takings clause
the gov't may take private property for public use
possessory taking- gov't physical occupation of proerty
regulatory taking- leaves no reasonable economically viable use of property
conditions on development
must be justfied by a benefit that is roughly proportionate to the burden imposed
public use for takings clause
so long as gov't acts on reasonable belief that taking will benefit the public
just compensation- takings clause
measure in terms of loss to the owner in reasonable market value terms
contracts clause
only aaplies to state or local interference with existing contracts
state and local gov't interference with contract
must be intermediate scrutiny.
- substantially impair party's rights under an existing contract?
- if so, is it reasonably and noarrolwy tailored means of promoting an important gov't interest?
state or local gov't interference with gov't contract
must meet strict scrutiny
ex post facto law
law that criminally punishes conduct that was lawful when it was done or that increases punishment for a crime after it was committed
- only in criminal cases
- does not apply in civil cases-
privacy rights
marry, procreate, custody of children, keep family together, contraceptives, abortion prior to viability, homosexual activity, refuse medical treatment
2nd amendment right to bear arms
it is a private right but can regualte where they are and keeping them from dangerous people
right to travel
either privileges and immunites clause or equal protection
- restrict travel must meet strict scrutiny
durational residency requirements
must meet strict scrutiny
- max for voting is 50 days
restriction on foreign travel
rational basis test
right to vote
- laws denying some people right to vote must meet strict scrutiny
- regulations of the electoral process to prevent fraud only need be on balance desireable
- at large elections ok unless proof of discriminatory intent
- use of race drawing election lines to bene minorities must meet strict scrutiny
- counting uncouted votes w/o standards in pres. election violates strict scrutiny
No fundamental right for
- right to practice trade of profession
- right to physican assisted suicide
- right to education
14th amendment
applies equal portection to state and local gov't
5th amendment equal protection
applies e.p. to the federal gov't
race classifications benefiting minorities
- strict scrutiny is applies
- numerical set-askides require clear proof of past discrimination
- educ. may use race as one factor
- public schools cannot use race to assign kids to schools unless strict scrutiny is met
gender classifications benefitting women
- will not be allowed if based on role stereotypes
- allowed if designed to remedy past discrimination and differences in opportunity
Strict Scrunity in Equal protection used for:
race, national origin, alienage (generally), travel (not foreign), voting
intermediate scrutiny in equal protection used for:
gender, illegitimacy, undocumented alien children
alienage classifications where only rational basis used
if they concern self gov't: voting, jury, polic officer, teacher, probation officer
- congress discrimination against aliens
- intediate scrutiny used for discrimination against undocumented alien children
content based restriction on speech
must meet strict strutiny
two types-
1. content based
2. viewpoint restrictions
content-neutral restrictions
must meet intermediate scrutiny
Prior restraints
court order prohibiting speech must meet strict scrutiny
note: in order to contest a speech provision must comply with order until it is overturned
gov't requiring license for speech
1. important reason for license
2. clear criteria leaving almost no discretion to the licensing authority
3. contain procedural safeguards such as prompt determination of requests for licenses
vagueness
if a reasonable person cannot tell what speech is prohibited and what is allowed
overbreadth
law regulates substantially more speech that the constitution allows
fighting words
these laws are vague and overbroad
symbolic speech
gov't can regulate conduct that communicates if it has an important interest unrelated to suppression of the message and if the impact on communication is no greater than necessary to achieve the gov't purpose
- flag burning- protected
- draft card burning- not
- nude dancing- not
- burning cross- as long as not done to intimidate
anonymous speech
protected
contribution limits in election campaign
constitutional
expediture limits
not constitutional
Standard for regulating incitement of illegal activity
a substantial liklihood of imminent illegal activity and if the speech is derected to cause imminent illgaility
Obsenity and sexually-oriented speech test
1. material must appeal to the purient interest
2. materail must be patnetly offensive under the law prohibiting obscenity
3. taken as a whole, the material must lack serious redeeming artistic, literary, politcal, or scientific value
zoning and adult book stores
gov't may use zoning to control location of adult bookstores
child pornography
can be completely banned but actual children need to be used in making
punishing private possession of obscene materials
gov't cannot do i
punishing private possession of child porn
gov't can do
exceptions to protection for profane and indecent speech
. over the broadcast medai (note difference for cable) and public schools
commercial speech
- false and deceptive ads not protected
- can prevent professionals from practicing under trade name
- may prohibit attorney, in perosn soliciation of clients for profit
- may not prohibit accountants from in person soliciation of clients for profit
- other commercial speech can be regulated if meets intermediate scruntiny
- it must be narrowly talied but does not need to be the least restrictive alternative
Defamation- Public Official/Public figure
- actual malice
- compensatory presumed/punitive
- P must prove fasilty
Private Matter of Public Concern
- Negligence and actual injury
- compensatory for actual injury
- presumed or punitive- actual malice
private figure, matter of private concern
- negligence
- compensatory for actual injury
- punitive damages do NOT require actual malice
- burden on Defendant to prove truth
The government may limit its dissemintaiton of information to protect privacy except:
criminal trials
Gov't employee's speech on job while in performance of their duties
not portected by the first amendment
public forum
ex. sidewalks, parks
- must be viewpoint neutral or meet strict scrutiny
- if neutral, time, place, manner restrictions that serve important gov't purpose and leaves open alternative places of communication
- does not need to be least restrictive
limited public forums
forums where gov't could close to speech but chooses not to- same rules apply as public forum
Non-public forums
- gov't can and does close to speech
- can regulate speech as long as the regulation is reasonable and viewpoint neutral
ex. military bases, areas outside prisons and jails, sidewalks on post office property, advertising space on city buses, airports (but can't prohibit the distribution of literature)
Private property- rt to free speech
no right
Freedom of assocation
- laws that punish group membership must meet strict scrutiny
- to punish person must prove:
1. actively affiliated with the group
2. knew of its illegal activities; and
3. had the specific intent of furthering those illegal activites
requiring disclosure of group membership where it would chill association
must meet strict scrutiny
gov't may prohibit discrimination as to group membership unless
it interferes with intimate association or expressive activity
ex. Klan excluding blacks, nazis exclusing Jews, Boy scouts excluding gays
Free exercise clausee cannot be used
to challnege a neutral law of general applicability
ex. peyote case
but the gov't may not deny benes to indiviudals who quit their jobs for religious reasons
Establishment Clause Test
SEX
1. must be a Secular purpose
2. Effect must be neither to advance nor inhibit religion
3. there must not be eXcessive entanglement w/religion
Discrimination between religion or religious groups must meet
strict scrutiny
School prayer
gov't sponsored is not ok but religious and community groups must have same access as other groups to facilities
gov't assistances to parochial schools
- ok as long as it is not used for religous instruction
MT Equal Protection
1. Similarly Situation
2. With respect to a legitimate government purpose
3. must receive like treatment