• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

aim

the aim of the study was to look into normative social influence and wanted ro see if people would conform to a group's wring answers.

what was Aschs study called

line of judgment task

what was the task the participants were asked to complete?

they were shown a series of lines of varying lengths that were labelled a,b and c, the firth line was labelled x.


they were asked which line resembles the x line.


how many naive paripants were there in the group?

one the rest were confederates

what are confederates?

these are partipants that know the real aim of the study and work for the researchers.


real partipants think the confederates are real.


how were confederates used is Aschs study?

they were told to give the wrong answer

how did partipants react to the confederates?

After hearing the confederates give the wrong response partipants had to answer.


75% of the partipants conformed at least once by giving the wrong answer.

how did size effect the conformity levels?

the greater the number of people the more likely partipants will conform.


upper limit of 7

how did the presence of another non conformist effect conformity?

conformity drop to near 0

did public or private nature of the responses effect conformity?

yes- public responses conformity occured more often.


when in private they were less likely to conform

how did differculty effect conformity?

the harder the task, the more similar in length the lines were the higher conformity

what are the benefits to the study being set in a lab?

variables could be controlled


experiment could be repeated easily


minimied risk of extraneous variables

was the use of an artifical situation a pro or con?

con


meant the study had low ecological validity and couldn't be generalised to other settings.

were the participants decived?

yes as they didn't know the other partipants were confederates

what part did confidence play in Aschs study?

the more confident the partipants seemed the less likely they were to conform.


didn't give into group pressure

what did Perrin and Spencers study with engineers find?

they were less likely to conform due ro the fact that they were more confident in their decision making.

what did Wiesenthal et al find?

participants who were confident in their ability to complete a task were not as likely to conform.

what did Eagly and Carli (1981) find out about gender?

before people felt that women conformed more


males and females differed most in studies where audiences created group pressure.

what did eagley find about gender?

Women are more likely to conform because they don't like group conflict.


Men are less likely to conform because they are expected to show independence and assertiveness.