• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/30

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

30 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

persuasion

an appeal in order to compel some action

argumentation

forming reasons, drawing conclusions, and applying them to a case in debate

claim/position

something assorted or maintained, the main point or position of your argument

subclaims

a subordinate point to a larger claims or position in your argument

support/evidence

support or evidence used to help strengthen (or support) your argument

refutation/counterargument/counter claim

to discredit an argument, particularly a counterargument (counter claim)

concession

conceding, acknowledging or admitting an opponents point

fact

an actual occurrence (a thing done)

statistic

a collection of quantitative data

example/anecdote

an individual instance taken to be representative of a general pattern, usually a short narrative of a relevant episode

opinion

a judgement, view, or appraisal formed in the mind

analogy/comparison

a comparison to a directly parallel case

authority/experts

support from an authority on the subject

shared beliefs/values

when a writer argues that if something is widely believed or valued, the reader should accept it

causal relationship

a writer asserts that one thing results from another

pathos

appeal based on emotion

logos

appeal based on logic or reason

ethos

appeal based on character of the speaker

sentimental

evoking sorrow or pity

logical fallacies

mistakes in logic

ad hominem

attacks the personality of the individual

non sequitur

latin for "it does not follow" when a statement isn't logically connected to another

false analogy

when two cases are not sufficiently parallel

hasty/sweeping/over generalization

uses too few examples needed to reach a valid conclusion

stereotyping

an oversimplified conception that one is regarded as embodying a set type .

bagging the question

assumes something to be true that needs proof

false authority

when the person is

slippery slope

some event must inevitably follow from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question

either or reasoning

does not allow for any shades of meaning compromise or intermediate cases

smoke screen

method of argument in which an opponent creates a weakened, incomplete, and often distorted version of an argument, then it destroys it