Argument And Debate

Front 1

according to the text the formal study of argumentation began

Back 1

in ancient greece

Front 2

which ethical responisbility of argumentation says that we shoudnt take short cuts or offer minimal proof and reasoning in making a point

Back 2

efficiency

Front 3

according to the text who has presumption at the star of a debate

Back 3

opponent

Front 4

you would most likely have presumption if you argued that

Back 4

something should not be done

Front 5

the word should most often appears in propositions of

Back 5

policy

Front 6

what is a proposition of fact

Back 6

a cure for cancer will soon be avaiable

Front 7

what is a proposition of vaule

Back 7

the cowboys are better then the bills

Front 8

what is a proposition of policy

Back 8

teens should be able to drive at age 13

Front 9

all of the following terms in a porositon need to be defined except

Back 9

negotiated terms

Front 10

________ is not an issue in a policy debate

Back 10

advocacy

Front 11

people who are verball aggressive attack the person instead of the person's arguments

Back 11

t

Front 12

Argumentation treats people as rational beins who can make decison when given sufficent reasons

Back 12

t

Front 13

ethical arguers should always present and support both sides of a topic

Back 13

f

Front 14

a speaker who claims that more mney should bes spent to build new prisons has the burden of proof

Back 14

t

Front 15

in a criminal trial the defense attorney has the burden of proff

Back 15

f

Front 16

the opponet of a propostion must present a prima facia case

Back 16

f

Front 17

a proposition of fact asserts that somethng has happned is happening or will happen in the future

Back 17

t

Front 18

propostions should be phrased as a single declarative statment containing one cnetral idea

Back 18

t

Front 19

when we deine terms operationally we usaly consult dictionary or some other authorative source to come up with a dfeintion

Back 19

f

Front 20

the opponet of a propostion must present a prima facia case

Back 20

f

Front 21

when advocaion a value prospostion you will not have a prima faie cae unless you present a criteria for intepreting the value-term in the propstion

Back 21

t

Front 22

a proposition of fact asserts that somethng has happned is happening or will happen in the future

Back 22

t

Front 23

when advocation a policy prosption you are addressing the issue of significance when you argue that your plan ill work

Back 23

f

Front 24

argumentativenss

Back 24

personality trait characterizedby high levels of invvement in the practices of arguments

Front 25

propostions should be phrased as a single declarative statment containing one cnetral idea

Back 25

t

Front 26

prima facie case

Back 26

a series of arguments tha if taken @ face value and left unrefuted would be sufficient to justify a change in belief or behavor

Front 27

when we deine terms operationally we usaly consult dictionary or some other authorative source to come up with a dfeintion

Back 27

f

Front 28

burden of proff

Back 28

the advocates responsibility to provide reasoning and proff sufficient to overcome presumption and warrant change i beief or behavior

Front 29

stock issues

Back 29

key issues contaned in a giver propostion

Front 30

how does the ELM expalin the role of arugmentation

Back 30

it says that it has two routes, the central route and the periheral route

Front 31

3 rules for phrasing a propostion for debate

Back 31

1)clear statment of change
2)should contain a central idea
3) should be neutral terms

Front 32

how does the ELM expalin the role of arugmentation

Back 32

it says that it has two routes, the central route and the periheral route