Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
32 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
persuasion
|
the process of influencing attitudes and behaviors
|
|
theory of feild-realted studies
|
establishes taht nota ll poeple reach conclusions in the same way and may react differently to the same evidence
|
|
group norm standards
|
habits of thinking or norms of a group
|
|
individual norm standards
|
people within a group taht have influence ove r the groups members
|
|
critial thinking
|
establsihes criteria and then matches the solution with the criteria
|
|
comparatice-advantage reasoning
|
1 persnt mode of operation
2 how it can solve the problem 3 why it doesnt cause greater problems 4 then its put into operation |
|
coercion
|
when the attempt to cahgne behavior relies on force
|
|
ehthos
|
speaker credibility
|
|
pathos
|
psychological appeals
|
|
logos
|
logical arguments
|
|
compentence
|
wisdom, authority, knowledge
|
|
charisma
|
compelling and have the ability to entice others
|
|
character
|
reputation, honesty, sensitvity to audiences values
|
|
inductive arguments
|
based on probablitly
2 forms- -generalizaion conclusion -hypothesis conclusion |
|
gerneralizaion conclusion
|
a number of specific instances taht are examined, from them you can predict a future occurance
|
|
hypothesis conclusion
|
a hypothesis is used to explain all available evidence
|
|
deductive argument
|
based on logical necessity
|
|
categorical syllogism
|
a type of deductive argument taht contains two premises and a conclusion
|
|
enthymeme
|
a rhetorical syllogism in which one presmise is not directly stated
|
|
disjunctive argument
|
a type of dedcutivce argument in which true alternative msut be establsihed
|
|
conditional argument
|
another from of deductive argument which sets up and if-then proposition
|
|
evidence
|
testimony from experts, statistics, and specific instances
|
|
hasty generalizations
|
a speaker who reaches a general conclusion from insufficient instances
|
|
faulty analogical reasoning
|
wehn speakers assume taht shared elements will continue indefinatly
|
|
faulty casual reasoning
|
occurs when a speaker claims without qualification taht something caused something else
|
|
ignoring the issue
|
using irrelevant arguments to obscure the real issue
|
|
ad hominem argument
|
attacks on the personal character of a source
|
|
ad populum argument
|
an appeal to the poeples prejudices and passions rather than focusing on the real issue
|
|
ad ignorantium argument
|
an attempt to prove that a statement is ture because it cannot be disproved
|
|
psychological appeals
|
enlists in a listeners emotions as motivation for accepting your arguments
|
|
maslows hierachry of human needs
|
a speaker must determine the level of need of a particualr group of listeners and then select appeals aimed at that level
|
|
ethnographic theory of human drives
|
indicates taht survival of the species, pleasure-seeking, security, and territoriality must be satisfied
|