• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/16

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

16 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Basics of Liability
• Many sources of law imposing liability
• many bases for imposing liability
• many parties to whom can be held liable
• bottom line: be sure that you are adequately insured
Sources of Liability
• Common law (state law, so differs)
o Negligence
o Contract
o Fraud (3 bad things in one-tort, contract, and/or criminal)
• Statute (mostly fed but also state)
o E.g. ’33 act, ’34 act, sox
Professional Liability for Negligence (Malpractice): need all of the following
o duty
o breach
o injury-
o actual causation
o proximate (foreseeability) causation
Liability is held to what standard?
held to standard of the profession
o comply with GAAP and GAAS
o accountants are not required to discover every fraud in the books
• if the fraud is not discovered because of the accountants negligence, will be liable
o violation of GAAP or GAAS is evidence of negligence
o however, compliance with GAAP or GAAS does not mean the accountant cannot be held to a higher standard by state laws or judge decisions
Special CPA Liability Issues
o most professionals services directly benefit only the client
o accountants' audits and audit opinions are for the benefit of persons other than the client
o this both broadens and complicates accountant liability issues
Defenses to Negligence
o 1. The accountant was not negligent
o 2. If the accountant was negligent, this negligence was not the proximate cause of the loss
o 3. The client was also negligent (only okay in states where contributory negliance as a defense)
Liability for Actual Fraud
o 1. A misrepresentation of a material fact has occurred
o 2. There is an intent to deceive
o 3. The innocent party has justifiably relied on the misrepresentation
o 4. To obtain damages, the innocent party must have been injured
Liability for Constructive Fraud
o Whether or not acted with fraudulent intent
o Paula accepts a reason for financial irregularities, even if it seems illegal = conduct characterized as intentional failure to perform a duty in reckless disregard of the consequences of such failure, gross negligence and held to be constructive fraud
Professionals' Contract Liability
• based on terms of contract between professional and client
• must "do what you say you'll do”
• usually, only parties to the contract can sue (usually only the client)
• in some cases, an intended 3rd party can recover (ch 12)
Accountants’ Negligence Liability
• Duty: follow generally accepted auditing standards
• breach: failure to do so
• injury: financial loss
• actual cause: breach -> loss
• proximate cause: loss was of this plaintiff foreseeable
Accountants' Negligence Issues- Breach
o Problem in financial statements does not necessarily mean that there was an audit failure
• Rules of GAAS
• audits involve audit judgment, so failure to uncover problem not always means a breach
• work papers are CPA's evidence
Accountants' Negligence Issues- actual cause
o Did audit lapse cause the loss, i.e. would proper audit have uncovered the problem?
Accountants' Negligence Issues- Proximate Cause
o Should CPA have expected that this particular plaintiff would suffer loss, given the breach of duty (failure to follow GAAS)
o How far out from client should CPA’s liability extend?
• Who uses the product of the CPA?
• Does the CPA know this?
• CPA Obligations:
 To client?
 To other users?
 To society?
Accountants' Negligence Issues- Proximate Cause- Ultramares rule/doctrine
 NY 1931: liable if privity (only if you are in a contract w/ client)
 Extended in 1985 to “near privity”
Accountants' Negligence Issues- Proximate Cause- Ultramares rule/doctrine
 summarize what all states do, in the majority states- To foreseen or known users or class (s)
 for example, renew line of credit with first bank. User is first bank. Renew line of credit with various possible creditors. Than there are more users
Practical Implications regarding CPA's (regarding liability)
• Liability variations do not affect CPA’s duty
• variations in extent of liability might affect insurance rates
• small town/big city differences in duty are mostly gone today