Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
110 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Kendel 2000
|
Maladaptive across situations
|
|
|
Achenback
|
probs externalizing and internalizing
|
|
|
DSMIV
|
1 Inattention
2Hyperactivity 3 Impulsivity |
|
|
Criteria (4)
|
less 7 yrs
impared w less 2 setting social, academic, occupational & social imparement |
|
|
Subcategories 2
|
Attention only
hyper-impulsive |
|
|
scholte 2001
|
factor analysis
pearson's r 412 kids 18 symptoms by carers |
|
|
Kerns 2001 4
|
ADHD matched sample
Inhib Attention time |
|
|
Gershon 2
|
Girls
key symptoms |
|
|
Rucklidge & Tannock
|
Girls more intellect probs & lang probs
|
|
|
Rucklidge & Tannock 2
|
Boys less speech probs
Girls impared attributions |
|
|
Gender paradox
|
More boys
|
|
|
Greene
|
Girls more interpersonal probs & social
|
|
|
Gershon, Rucklidge & Tannock
|
Internalizing probs ADHD
|
|
|
Evolution 2
|
natural altruism
natural selection |
|
|
Gilger 2
|
80% concord MZ
30% DZ |
|
|
Deutsch 87 4
|
Retrospective adopt
adoptee= adhd bio high adhd bio high mood dis |
|
|
Castellanos 2002
7 |
10yr
medicated vs non mri grey & white matter decrease volume no ^ w age early genetic |
|
|
Thapar
|
Cf twins register
MZ 100% concord dop recept DRD4 Corroborated |
|
|
Antenatal to nicotine
4 |
animal study
nicotine = dop increase Increase nicot = increase hyper nicotine predictor |
|
|
Millberger 97
2 |
20-25% kids ADHD smoked
10% didnt |
|
|
Thapar 2003
10 |
1452 Great match twin reg
mothers smoke in preg american journal psych 0-20 cigs Teacher report 3/4 variance to smoking common environment 10% variance to smoking if remove smoking ^ outcome of risk factors |
|
|
Barkley 98
|
adhd ! attention than Learning diss kids
|
|
|
Leung & conolly 96
|
Distraction doesnt fx adhd
|
|
|
Lorch 2000
|
Tv and toys distract
|
|
|
Douglas 83
|
Novel or salient
|
|
|
Taylor 95
|
No selective deficit?
|
|
|
Van de Meer & Seargent
|
Irrelevant stim increases performance
|
|
|
Taylor 95
3 |
Sustained attention
ADHD more errors slower than TD |
|
|
Swaab- Barneveld 2000
|
attention deficit in other dis
|
|
|
Taylor 95
|
Not sustained worse over time
|
|
|
Slusarek 2001
|
Other than inattention is reason
|
|
|
Dane, Schachari & Tannock 2001
|
ADHD more acive in afternoon than TD
|
|
|
Porrino 83
4 |
ADHD boys more active in maths and reading
than recess or PE More structured = worse |
|
|
Schater & logan 90
4 |
Stop signal task
press to stimulate than to inhibit (WCST) ADHD bad |
|
|
Whalen 89
|
Matching famil figures test
ADHD not always match |
|
|
Barkley 98
|
Slightly lower IQ than sib
|
|
|
Sonuga Barke 94
|
Impared IQ 3 yrs
|
|
|
Schacter 1991
|
many normal IQ
|
|
|
Faraone 96
|
Lots of learning dis kids
|
|
|
Willcut 2001
|
Non-ADHD vs Reading dis
worst in retrieve and memorising wrds |
|
|
Willcut 2001
2 |
Non-ADHD vs Reading dis
worst in retrieve and memorising wrds |
|
|
Tannock 2000 (repeated Willcutt 2001)
|
7-11yrs
Inattention predicts later reading probs |
|
|
Barkley 92,98
|
special classes
bad grades 50% need tutoring |
|
|
Pennington & Ozonoff 96
|
EF
|
|
|
Whalen & Henker 98
|
High social impact
|
|
|
Cadesky, Mota & schachter 2000
|
Independently process social cues
|
|
|
Menlick & Henshaw 96
|
Goals at expense of social rules
|
|
|
Flicek 92
|
Other kids view ADHD kids as neg
|
|
|
Lahey 98
|
Teachers assoc ADHD as low co-op and disruptive
|
|
|
Barkley 98
4 |
parents directive & intrusive
Parenting stress Alchol use High marital conflict and divorce |
|
|
Szatmari 89
3 |
7% poison, 23% bone AD
3% poison, 15% TD older= driving offenses & accidents |
|
|
Hinshaw 98
|
Deficient in self care
Must be watched |
|
|
Slusarek 2001
|
Motivation deficit
poor underrewards |
|
|
Barkley 90
|
more salient rewards
|
|
|
Tripp & alsop 2001
|
immediate reward better than delayed
|
|
|
Songua & Berke
|
due to avoid delay not move towards immediate
|
|
|
Barkley 5
|
Working mem
Time |
|
|
Aman, Roberts & Pennington
|
Boys felt bad when did badly; not a general motivation prob
|
|
|
Denney & Rapport 2001
|
Impared working mem
representations disorganised |
|
|
Denney & Rapport 2001
|
Impared working mem
representations disorganised redirected into less slowly processed tasks |
|
|
Douglas 88
|
high order processing
deficit w inhib deficit w arrousal deficit w understand beh cons |
|
|
Quay 97
|
Gray's neuro model of brain function
2 Brain systems 1. Behavioral inhibition -anxiety -novel situations -punishment and reward 2. Behavioral activation -rewards |
|
|
Quay 97
|
Is underactive adhd
|
|
|
Barkley 98
|
Exec function
self reg hyper and impulse frontal brain damage |
|
|
Geller 2002
|
externalizing
OCD 30% comorb |
|
|
Costin 2002
|
rates higher in clinic than community
|
|
|
Whalen & Hecker 98
|
Oppositional defiant disorder
35-70% ADHD=develops ODD 30-50% ADHD=CD |
|
|
Nader 2001
|
ODD/ADHD one disorder?
NO! Different symptom clusters |
|
|
Waschbusch 2002
|
Distinct other features
Combination of three distinct features; High range conduct dis, worse ADHD |
|
|
Gadow & Nolan 2002
|
Holds for pre-schoolers
Strong fx on peer relations and social functioning |
|
|
Wasbuch 2002
|
Poor parenting
Poor social class |
|
|
Jensen 1997
|
Should adhd and 3 subcategories be together?
|
|
|
Wasbuch 2002
|
but they are morelikely a combination of fx not a more complex fx.
|
|
|
Barkley 2002
|
101 teenagers
39 community controls ADHD< attention time diff work mem Behavioral inhib CNS Social learning |
|
|
Tantam 91
|
Anxiety Depression Schizo
|
|
|
Kiln 94
|
Continuum?
|
|
|
Wing
|
Au spectrum
|
|
|
Schopler 88
|
Variant
|
|
|
Szatsmari 89
|
HFA
|
|
|
Tantam
|
AS/HFA = continum
|
|
|
Burgoine & wing
|
Triplets No speech delay
|
|
|
Szatsmari
|
IQ controlled AS best apple, banana, truck , grouping AS WCST HFA- motor coordiation
|
|
|
Ozonoff 91
|
ICD-10 Diff VIQ Emotion perception Central exec Verbal mem TOM AS increased
|
|
|
Kiln 95
|
ICD 10 Age and IQ matched AS VIQ>PIQ HFA-VIQ=PIQ Motorskills Visual-motor Non-verbal Vis-memory
|
|
|
Method probs Criteria IQ and MA Methodology
|
Prior 98
|
|
|
HFA/AS/PDD WISC, TOM, ADS checklist Verbal task OOO No language TOM BC Evidence for continuum
|
B+C close to norm, group overlap AS & HF similarities Few friendships Low speech Dinosaur
|
|
|
Satmari 92
|
Diagnoses shouldnt be everything
|
|
|
As
|
Good TOM Socially abnormal Scripts Timing
|
|
|
Gilchrist 2001
|
AS/HFA/CD WISC/ADI/ADOS good validity Retrospecive report No difficulties Speech Imitative play Motor control Verbal language
|
|
|
Mayes & Calhoun 2002
|
HFA same development of asp later
|
|
|
Prior 98
|
No differences between A and AS
|
|
|
Mayes 2001
|
Use same AS no language probs Speech later develops
|
|
|
Baron Cohen
|
Less impared AS/A
|
|
|
Gilberg Coleman 93
|
25% A=HFA
|
|
|
Kugler 98
|
Aeitiogenesis and pathogenesis Understand wait longer
|
|
|
Rapin 99
|
Rubella Thalidomide Herpes Tuberous sclerosis Fragile x Angleman Cornelia de ange syndrome Delong Brian damage Neurotransm
|
|
|
Wing 83
|
MZ% concord
|
|
|
Bailey, Le couter and Gottesman 95
|
Multiple genes
|
|
|
Gilberg 98
|
A= 44 chromo linked
|
|
|
Rutter 98
|
Partial tetrasomy chromo 15
|
|
|
Gilberg and coleman 92
|
Male personality
|
|
|
Szatmari 98
|
X linked seratonin tranporter Env and brain inj
|
|
|
Smalley
|
Sib 3-8% diagnosed autism
|
|
|
Hallmayer 96
|
X chromo ¾ genes for autism
|
|
|
Rodier 2000
|
Relatives 50-50 phenotype
|
|
|
Folstein 99
|
DS vs Au Au relative problem
|
|
|
Fombonne 97
|
low verbal IQ
|
|
|
Delong 99
|
High no of BGTC circuitry disorders
|
|
|
Cohen and hammer 97
|
Parents of asp have high visual perception
|
|
|
Volmar kin & pauls 2000
|
Genetic high aspergers
|
