Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
21 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Risk assessment procedures
|
Include inquiries of management, analytical procedures, observation and inspection, and other procedures.
|
|
6 stages of the audit process
|
1) Planning
2) Obtain an understanding of the client and its environment 3) Asses risk of misstatement and design further procedures 4) Perform further procedures 5) Complete the Audit 6) Issue the audit report |
|
engagement risk
|
risk of losing reputation due to client with lack of integrity or being a part of a client who goes bankrupt
|
|
engagement letter
|
to the client from the auditor, contains information about the audit and if signed by the client it becomes a contract
|
|
three risk factors for committing fraud
|
1) Pressure
2) Opportunity 3) Rationalization |
|
strategic lens model
|
obtaining information about the clients business environment.
|
|
Areas of interest in strategic lens model
|
1) Business Strategy
2) Customers 3) Suppliers 4) Investors 5) Regulators 6) Other external and internal parties |
|
materiality
|
if reasonable person would have their decision changed by the amount that is misstated
|
|
measures of materiality examples
|
1) 5 to 10% of income
2) 1% of total assets or revenues 3) 1 to 5% of owner's equity 4) 1.6(greater of assets or revenues)^2/3 |
|
materiality and audit risk
|
inversely related
|
|
evaluation
|
used to determine whether a material misstatement is there
|
|
iron curtain approach
|
determines materiality based on total financial statement effect even if over multiple years
|
|
rollover approach
|
determines materiality based on current years effect
|
|
iron curtain or rollover
|
if either is found to be material an adjustment is necessary according to SEC
|
|
5 things that can be done if there is high financial statement risk
|
1. use more experienced auditors
2. increase supervision 3. increase emphasis on professional skepticism 4. Use unpredictable audit procedures 5. Increase the scope of the audit procedures |
|
Are analytical procedures related to revenues required?
|
yes
|
|
How do auditors respond to fraud risk?
|
1) modify procedures and how the audit is conducted
2) an alteration in the nature, timing, and extent of the procedures performed 3) performance of procedures that further addresses managements ability to override controls |
|
The following items should be documented in relation to risk assessment?
|
1. discussion with audit team about error and fraud
2. key elements about the entities environment 3. assessment of risk at financial statement and relevant assertion level 4. the risks identified |
|
The following should be documented in relation to auditors' consideration of fraud?
|
1. discussion with engagement team about fraud risk
2. procedures performed to determine fraud risk 3. the fraud risks identified and the response to those risks 4. any other items that are necessary and caused the team to use additional fraud procedures 5. nature of communications with management, audit committee |
|
Vouch or Trace? Completeness assertion
|
Trace
|
|
Vouch or Trace? Existence assertion
|
Vouch
|