Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
33 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Incremental validity
|
Increase in decision making accuracy for employer
|
|
Base Rate:
|
% employees doing okay without a predictor. from 0.0 to 1.0.
Moderate (.50) best Incremental VAlidity |
|
Adverse Impact
|
80% rule
|
|
Differential Validity
|
Valid for one group, not valid or less valid for another
|
|
Unfairness
|
Lower predictor cutoff, same performance
|
|
Incremental validity
|
Increase in decision making accuracy for employer
|
|
Base Rate:
|
% employees doing okay without a predictor. from 0.0 to 1.0.
Moderate (.50) best Incremental VAlidity |
|
Adverse Impact
|
80% rule
|
|
Differential Validity
|
Valid for one group, not valid or less valid for another
|
|
Unfairness
|
Lower predictor cutoff, but same validity, same performance
|
|
Multiple Regression
|
Compensatory way of combining predictors. (one predictor can offset others)
|
|
Multiple cutoff
|
Non-compensatory: Have to get minimums to be considered.
|
|
Super: (associated terms)
|
Self Concept - job should match
5 Stages Career Maturity (Career development inventory) Life Career Rainbow- life roles and stages (ie, student beginner, etc) |
|
Holland (associated terms)
|
Personality
RIASEC Differentiation |
|
Roe:
|
cf: Maslow, personality and basic needs- 8 types, career change usually within
|
|
Tiedeman and Ohara
|
cf: Erikson:
Ego Identity Development: Differentiation/Integration |
|
Krumbolz:
|
Behavior/social learning theory:
4 Factors: Genetic, Environmental, learning, task approach Career Belief Inventory |
|
Brousseau & Driver
|
"Career Concept"
Linear Expert Spiral Transitory |
|
TWA
|
Theory of Work Adjustment: Dawis & Lofquist
Satisfaction:job correspond to values Satisfactoriness: Skills correspond |
|
Job Characteristics Model (Hackman & Oldham)
|
Skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, performance feedback.
|
|
Expectancy Theory:
|
High Expectancy: effort=performance
High Instrumentality: performance = reward Positive Valence: Reward is desirable |
|
Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory
|
Goal Setting
Self-Observation- monitor progress Self-Evaluation-compare bx to goals Self-Reaction- affective/cognitive reaction to evaluation |
|
Contingency Theory: Fiedler
|
The LPC thing-
Low LPC = High task High LPC = high relationship Situational Favorableness: Amount of influence a leader has: ie, in more structured tasks, with positive relationships, amount of reward power Low LPC best in extremes- good or bad, High LPC best in moderate situations |
|
Path-Goal (House) Theory
|
Leaders help line up personal and professional goals
|
|
Situational: Hersey & Blanchard
Telling Selling Participating Delegatinvg |
High Task, Low relation
High task, high relation Low task, high relation Low task low relation This should be matched with "job maturity" willing/able to have responsibility |
|
Normative Decision Making (Vroom, Yetton, Jago)
AI Alone AII- seeks input, decides alone CI 1-1 consultation CII Group consultation Group |
Autocratic
Consultative Group DECISION TREE |
|
Group Tasks:
Additive Compensatory Disjunctive Conjunctive |
a: everything added together
c: inputs averaged d: select the input of the best member c: limited by worst Better than individual on a or c. |
|
Stages of group development
|
Tuckman & Jensen 5 stages
Forming Storming Norming Performing Adjourning |
|
Lewin's Force Field theory of change
|
Organizations either promote (driving forces) or resist (restraining forces) change.
1. Unfreezing 2. Changing 3. Refreezing |
|
Nadlers THeory of change:
|
Must change 4 things:
1. informal elements (communicaiton, leadership) 2. Formal elements (rules, processes) 3. Individual characteristics 4. Job characteristsics Change in one will cause change in all... |
|
Quality Circles vs. SMWT
|
Get informal group to work together on problems and make recommendations
SMWT: Do same but actually make decisions |
|
Process consultation
|
Focus on behaviors and communication style over attitudes.
|
|
Survey Feedback:
3 Steps |
1. Data Collection
interview and collect data create survey 2. Feedback: Small groups at top and spread down 3. Action plans |