• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Moral Absolutism

There is at least one principle that ought never to be violated

Categorical Imperatives:


1. Universal Law

act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will that it should be a universal law

2. The Principle of Humanity

always treat persons as an end and never as a means only

Doctrine of Doing and Allowing (DDA)

It is always morally worse to do harm than to allow that same harm to occur

Active euthanasia

do something to end the person's life

Passive euthanasia

Allow the person to die

Opponents of Active Euthanasia

always worse than passive




always wrong




passive can be morally permissible

Rachels

If Smith and Jones did something equally wrong, then the DDA is false

Utilitarianism on Active Euthanasia

1. an action is right if it promoted happiness and wrong if it promotes pain and suffering


2. Active euthanasia, at the patient's own request, often would decrease the amount of pain and suffering


3. Therefore, active is often the morally right thing to do

Rachels on Euthanasia

the DDA does not justify a ban on active euthanasia




in some cases, active is morally better than alternatives