• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Business-level strategies
• A term for strategic approaches at the highest, most straightforward level
Choice of competitive scope
• Broad—many customer segments; geographic breadth and scale; product & service variety
• Narrow—tailoring to specific customer segments; local geography; limited product & service
Low cost
• One of the generic strategies available to companies; it implies a broad market approach where the company rigorously reduces costs and expenses in an effort to lower the overall cost of operations below their competitors
Differentiation
• One of the generic strategies available to companies; it implies a broad market approach where activities performed by the company provide sufficiently differentiated value to allow the company to obtain economic returns, generally through higher pricing
Low-cost leadership
• Of the companies that pursue a low-cost generic strategy, one company will enjoy the lowest cost structure; this company has the strongest competitive position among low-cost strategists, since it enjoys greater pricing flexibility and can more easily weather industry conditions that compress profit margins
Stuck-in-the-middle
• A condition where a company simultaneously pursues both a differentiation and a low-cost strategy; the result is more often expenses that are too high and a product that does command a premium price
Market scope
• The degree to which a company competes broadly or narrowly within an industry; differences in geography, customer segments, and user needs
Parity
o Though companies compete on cost or some dimension of differentiation, they must maintain relative equality with other companies on other dimensions that are valued in the marketplace; without reasonable parity on other valued conditions, the lowest-cost competitor or most effective differentiation on some dimension may not succeed
Caveats
• Parity
• Evolution of customer expectations
• Evolution of competition
Low-cost strategy
• Rivalry
o When there are few opportunities to differentiate one’s product or service offering, then standardization of product/service features is accompanied by highly competitive pricing
o When there is standardization of products of services among competitive rivals, the low-cost competitor will tend to fare better because the company with the low-cost structure will enjoy a higher profit margin
• Buyers and suppliers
o When buyers and suppliers have strong bargaining power and are able to exact economic concessions from competitors, the company with the lowest cost structure is able to fare better
o If buyers experience low switching costs, the low-cost competitor has the greatest flexibility to reduce pricing in order to keep and attract buyers
• New entrants and substitutes
o Low-cost position offers flexibility to reduce price and offset any perceived advantages that other companies may offer
Drivers of low-cost position
• Economies of scale
o Realized as unit costs drop while quantities produced each period grow larger
o Able to attain significant cost savings as a result of being able to spread fixed and indirect costs over a greater number of units
o Specialization of activities and the knowledge creation of assembly lines that are possible when seeking to produce large quantities
• Capacity utilization
• Experience curve
• Product/service design
o Simplicity, easy manufacturing, simple sourcing of raw material, inexpensive packaging
• Process innovation
• Internal value chain coordination
Risks associated with low-cost strategy
• Low-cost strategy vs. low-cost leadership
• Price is not a strategy
o Relatively easy for any competitor to try and use low price as a customer attraction, or to instantly match another company’s price
• Customers do not value the benefits derived from low costs
• Cost positions can be imitated over time
Differentiation strategy
• Rivalry
o When diversity and variety exists among customers and their needs, then strategic variety is possible within an industry
• Buyers
o If buyer concentration does not exist and consequently buyers have little power, then cost/price relationships may become less influential in the buying process
• Suppliers
o As long as diversity of needs exists among buyers and there is no standardization or commoditization occurring within the industry, higher costs from suppliers may be offset by higher prices charge that support the kind of value chain investments in differentiation
• New entrants and substitutes
o Often shields competitors from new competition presented by new entrants and possible substitutes
Drivers of differentiation strategy
• Product and service features
o Characteristics that respond to customer needs
o Integrity of the product or service
o The use of quality inputs
• Psychographic and cognitive benefits
o Marketing and advertising
o Responsiveness to customers
o Corporate reputation
• Process innovation (value chain design)
• Internal value chain coordination
Risks associated with differentiation strategy
• Product differentiation is not a strategy
• Customers do not value the benefits derived from differentiation
• Differentiation positions can be imitated over time
Outsourcing
• When another organization is employed to perform a business process or service that is part of the company’s value chain
• To enhance strategic position in the marketplace
• To offload activities in which they do not have any special competence and which do not contribute to its strategic position
Dangers of outsourcing
• Loss of control over costs or differentiation values
• Disruption of coordination and linkages in the value chain
• Hollowing out the core
• Competitive learning