• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

describing the evidence

know the hypothesis, exposure variable, outcome variable and the study design




should be able to defin the following population


study population -individuals who actually took part in the study




elgiible population inviduals who met the criteria to be included in the study




source population - the population from which elegible study subjects were drawn




the external population - inviduals not part of the sourcep opulation

internal validity (non causal explanations)

are the results valid for the subjects who studied?




consider bias, confounding and chance (non causal mechanisms)


bias - no analytical maniuplation solves problem


confounding - appropriate analysis solves issue


chance should be the the main result of the study

internal validity (causal explanations)



correct temporal relationship? putative exposure must act before the outcome occurs


is relationship strong?


dose response relationship?


consistency? causation apply for wide range of study subjects


specificity? given exposure provides a specified outcome

external validity

but whether the association between outcome and exposure given by the study participants is likely to apply to other groups

comparison with other evidence

clinical questions a large amount of evidence is available which come from different types of studies




hierarchy 1 randomised clinical trials 2 cohort and case control studies 3 other comparative studies 4 case series, descriptive studies, clinical experience

consistency

to say study results are consistent requires that the association has been observed in a number of different studies.

plausibility

refers to tue observed association being biologically understandable on the basis of current knowledge concerning its likely mechanism

coherency

regarded coherent if it fits the general features of the distribution of both exposure and the outcome under assessment.