Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
24 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Qualitative Research
|
- interpretive or critical social science.
- non linear research path - speak a language of "cases and contexts" |
|
Quantitative Research
|
- positivist approach
- linear research path - speak a language of "variables and hypothesis" |
|
Qualitative - Finding a Research Topic
|
Begin with a vague research question and the topic emerges slowly during research.
|
|
Quantitative - Finding a Research Topic
|
Narrow it down before doing research.
|
|
Practical Limitations
|
Eg. Time, cost, access to resources, etc.
|
|
Grounded Theory
|
- theory is built from data
- builds theory by making comparisons. |
|
Context
|
- note what came before or what surrounds the data.
- consider the cultural context. - if ignored meaning and significance are distorted. |
|
The Case and Process
|
- usually told as a narrative plot
- passage of time is very important |
|
The Case and Process
|
- usually told as a narrative plot
- passage of time is very important |
|
Interpretation
|
Assign meaning to something.
|
|
First Order Interpretation
|
Contains the inner motives, personal reasons, and point of view of the people who are being studied.
|
|
Second Order Interpretation
|
Acknowledges that however much a researcher tries to get very close to what he or she is studying they are still "on the outside looking in".
|
|
Third Order Interpretation
|
Translates his research into a form that facilitates communication with people who are more distance from the original source.
|
|
Variable
|
Central idea
|
|
Attributes
|
Values or categories of a variable.
|
|
Independent variable
|
The cause.
|
|
Dependant variable
|
The effect.
|
|
Intervening variable
|
Shows the link between the IV and DV.
|
|
Hypothesis
|
Proposition that can be tested.
|
|
5 Characteristics of a Causal Hypothesis
|
1. at least 2 variables.
2. expresses a cause-effect relationship. 3. expressed as a prediction. 4. logically linked to a research question and a theory. 5. it is falsifiable. |
|
Null Hypothesis
|
Test hypothesis by looking for evidence that will allow them to accept or reject the null hypothesis. (no relationship exists)
|
|
Ecological Fallacy
|
Gathers data at a higher unit of analysis but wants to make a statement about a lower unit.
|
|
Reductionism
|
A researcher explains macro-level events but has evidence only about specific individuals.
|
|
Spuriousness
|
2 variables are associated but not causally related (3rd variable is involved)
|