Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
31 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Rule: for what offenses does the Fourth Amendment permit arrest
|
ANY offense.
Including those punishable by monetary fine only. |
|
Define: Arrest
|
in custody
against will for interrogation or prosecution |
|
Rule: Situations considered de facto arrests
|
When the police compel someone to come to the station house for questioning or for fingerprinting.
|
|
Basic Rule: Arrest and Warrants
|
You do NOT need a warrant in a public place.
You DO need a warrant in someone's home. In the home of a third party, need BOTH search AND arrest warrants. |
|
Rule: Common Enterprise Theory and Arrest
|
During a traffic stop, if officer discoveres evidence that suggests a common unlawful enterprise. . .
may arrest ALL PASSENGERS, based on shared dominion and control over contraband. |
|
Challenges to Constitutionality of a Confession (3)
|
1: Due Process--14th Amendment
2: 6th Amendment--Right to Counsel 3: 5th Amendment--Miranda |
|
NYS Distinction: Challenges to Constitutionality of Confession
|
May ALSO bring a challenge under NY's INDELIBLE RIGHT TO COUNSEL.
|
|
Rule: Standard for Confessions under Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment
|
INVOLUNTARINESS
Exclude if the confession is the product of police coercion. |
|
Rule: Standard for Confessions under the 6th Amendment
|
6th Amendment attaches when formally charged, NOT upon arrest.
Applies ONLY to the charged offense--no protection for interrogation regarding other, uncharged criminal activity. |
|
NYS Distinction: Standard for Indelible Right to Counsel
|
GREATER protection than the 6th Amendment
Attaches when: 1: in custody, with police activity "overwhelming to the lay person" and defendant REQUESTS counsel 2: at arraignment 3: on the filing of an accusatory instrument 4: any significant judicial activity If taken in for custody on a charge and request counsel, police MAY NOT question about other, unrelated matters. |
|
NYS Distinction: Waiver of Indelible Right to Counsel
|
Waiver MUST take place in the attorney's presence.
|
|
Rule: Core Miranda Warnings
|
1: right to remain silent
2: anything you say or do will be used against you in a court of law 3: you have the right to an attorney 4: you have the right to have an attorney appointed. |
|
Basic Rule: When are Miranda Warnings Necessary
|
1: In Custody
2: Interrogation |
|
Define: In custody for Miranda Purposes
|
If the atmospheres is characterized by police domination and coercion, such that his or her freedom of action is limited in a significant way.
|
|
Define: Interrogation for Miranda Purposes
|
Any conduct the police knew or should have known was likely to elicit an incriminating response.
|
|
Rule: Public Safety and Miranda
|
If custodial interrogation is prompted by an immediate concern for public safety, Miranda warnings are unnecessary, and any incriminating statements are admissible against the suspect.
|
|
Rule: Valid Miranda Waiver
|
Core Requirements:
KNOWING and INTELLIGENT: understands the nature of his rights and the consequences of abandoning them. VOLUNTARY: not the product of police coercion |
|
NYS Distinction: Valid Miranda Waiver
|
If police use deception or concealment to keep a parent away from a child being interrogated, the child's waiver may be deem invalid.
|
|
Rule: Miranda Waiver Burden of Proof
|
Prosecution bears the burden of proving a valid waiver by PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE.
|
|
If suspect asserts right to remain silence, can police resume questioning later on a different matter?
|
YES, provided they "scrupulously honor" the earlier request and obtain a valid Miranda waiver.
|
|
Rule: Questioning once a suspect requests counsel
|
ALL questioning must cease, UNLESS initiated byt he suspect.
Miranda is NOT offense specific. May not question on any subject outside the presence of an attorney. |
|
Rule: Admissibility of Statements in Violation of Miranda
|
1: INADMISSIBLE in case in chief
2: ADMISSIBLE to impeach 3: INADMISSLBE to impeach 3rd parties |
|
Rule: Miranda and Physical Fruits
|
A Miranda violation does NOT require suppression of the PHYSICAL fruits of unwaived by VOLUNTARY statements.
|
|
Rule: Admissibility of Subsequent Statements and Miranda
|
Statements subsequent to an inadmissible statement ARE admissible with a VALID waiver. . .
PROVIDED, that the initial violation was not through the use of inherently coercive police tactics offensive to due process. |
|
Rule: Accidently Admitted Evidence and Miranda Violations
|
If evidence that should have been excluded under Miranda was admitted, a guilty verdict will stand if:
1: error was harmless 2: defendant would have been convicted without the tainted evidence. |
|
Rule: FIFTH Amendment Right to Counsel and PreTrial ID procedures
|
NO Fifth Amendment Right to Counsel
|
|
Rule: SIXTH Amendment Right to Counsel and PreTrial ID procedures
|
Right to counsel at LINEUPS and SHOWUPS that take place AFTER formal chargin.
NO right to counsel for PHOTO ARRAYS. |
|
Rule: INDELIBLE Right to Counsel and PreTrial ID procedures
|
Right to counsel BEFORE charging if:
1: police are aware that you have counsel 2: request counsel present |
|
Rule: Pretrial ID Procedures and Due Process
|
Violates the due process clause of the 14th amendment when:
so UNNECESSARILY SUGGESTIVE that there is a substantial likelihood of MISIDENTIFICATION |
|
Rule: Remedy for Unconstitutional Pretrial IDs
|
Exclude that witness's ID AT TRIAL.
|
|
Rule: In court ID after an unconstitutional pretrial ID
|
Generally not allowed, UNLESS
prosecution can prove that the ID is based on observations OTHER than the unconstitutional show up, line up, or photo array. Look at: -witness opportunity to view defendant -certainty of ID - specificity of the information offered |