Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
25 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
team that is for a cause-should change status quo
|
affirmative
|
|
regulated discussion of a proposition by two multiple sides
|
debate
|
|
sources
|
evidence
|
|
controls debate
|
judge
|
|
the bad side effects
|
disadvantages
|
|
team that defends the status quo
|
negative team
|
|
present system-existing state of affairs
|
status quo
|
|
evidence
|
proof
|
|
resolution
|
proposition
|
|
What is this years resolution?
|
Resolved: the united states federal government should substantially increase alternative energy incentives in the United States.
|
|
the policy that is in effect now should remain in effect until it is proven that problems exist and some other plan would be better
|
presumption
|
|
case that proves that all of the stock issues are true (at first sight)
|
prima facie
|
|
to take notes and the notes that are taken
|
flow
|
|
reason for changing from the present system to something else
|
case
|
|
actualy proposal or rules and regulation that they set up to alleeviate the problems in the status quo
|
plan
|
|
negative runs against the affirmative team
|
topicality
|
|
basis for proposed changes in policy
|
stock issues
|
|
of great importance or large in magnitude
|
significant
|
|
general question of some concern to a group of people
|
problem area
|
|
stock issue that is very imporant in a debate
|
inherency
|
|
What is the difference between the afiirmative case and plan?
|
case is the reason for changing and plan is the actual change (proposal)
|
|
Waht is this year's problem area?
|
the united states- alternative energy incentives
|
|
Name five stock issues in a debate
|
significance, harms, advantages, inherency and solvency
|
|
Which team has presumption?
|
negative team
|
|
What are two components of significance?
|
qualitative, quantitative
|